INCOME TAX OFFICER, JAIPUR vs. MADHU AGARWAL, JAIPUR
What were the facts?
The Revenue appealed against the CIT(A)'s order allowing rebate under Section 87A on short-term capital gains (STCG). The assessee claimed rebate on STCG, which was initially denied by CPC but allowed by the CIT(A).
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that Section 87A provides rebate on the entire tax liability computed on total income, without distinguishing between normal income and special rate income like STCG. The existing law did not restrict this rebate, and the denial by CPC was based on system logic, not statutory mandate.
What were the issues?
Whether rebate under Section 87A is allowable on tax on short-term capital gains taxable under Section 111A, especially when the assessee opts for the new tax regime under Section 115BAC(1A).
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 87A,Section 111A,Section 115BAC(1A),Section 250,Section 143(1)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, JAIPUR BENCHES, “SMC” BENCH, JAIPUR
The present appeal has been filed by the Revenue against the order passed by the Office of the Commissioner of Income Tax, Appeal, Addl./JCIT(A), Mumbai-07(hereinafter referred to as “Ld. CIT(A)”), dated 23.12.2025 under Section 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as “the Act”).
The Revenuehas raised the following grounds of appeal:-
P a g e | 2 Madhu Agarwal
Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the Ld. Addi CIT(A)-7, mumbat is justified in allowing the rebate u/s 87A of the Act, on STCG, when rebate u/s 87A of the Act is not available in respect of Income Tax payable on income chargeable to tax on special rates, which includes
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 87A
- Income Tax Officer, Jhunjhunu vs Shashi Kant Tulsian, JhunjhunuITA 620/JPR/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed6 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Income Tax Officer, Jhunjhunu vs Shashi Kant Tulsian, JhunjhunuITA 620/JPR/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed6 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Syed Kabeer Hussain, Bangalore, Karnataka vs Income Tax Officer Ward -7(2)(1) Bangalore…ITA 1540/BANG/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed23 Sept 2026AY 2024-25
- Shrey Jain, Jodhpur vs AO, JodhpurITA 124/JODH/2026[2024-2025]Status: Disposed14 Sept 2026AY 2024-2025
- ITO, Jaipur vs Kailash Mamodia, JaipurITA 1158/JPR/2026[2025]Status: Disposed11 Sept 2026
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Prakash Enterprises Its Proprietor Sudhir Kumar Choudhary vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 6 Oct 2026
- M/S Sree Narayan Construction vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 6 Oct 2026
- M/S Recro Furniture Private Limited vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 6 Oct 2026
- Ipca Laboratories LTD. vs. Union Of INDIA Through The Jt. Secretary, Dept. Of Revenue, Ministry Of Finance And OrsBombay · 6 Oct 2026
- Scottment Alco Bev Fillers PVT LTD vs. State Of ChhattisgarhChhattisgarh · 5 Oct 2026