INCOME TAX OFFICER, JHUNJHUNU vs. BANWARI LAL BIDAWATKA, SIKAR
What were the facts?
The assessee claimed a rebate under Section 87A on short-term capital gains (STCG) taxable under Section 111A, while opting for the new tax regime under Section 115BAC(1A). The CPC denied this rebate, but the CIT(A) allowed it. The Revenue appealed this decision.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the assessee is entitled to the rebate under Section 87A on STCG. The absence of an express bar in Section 87A or Section 111A, coupled with the prospective nature of subsequent amendments, supports this entitlement.
What were the issues?
Whether rebate under Section 87A is available on short-term capital gains taxable under Section 111A for assessees opting for the Section 115BAC(1A) regime, and whether the Explanatory Memorandum to the Finance Bill 2025 can override statutory provisions.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 87A,Section 111A,Section 115BAC(1A),Section 250,Section 143(1)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, JAIPUR BENCHES, “SMC” BENCH, JAIPUR
The present appeal has been filed by the Revenue against the order passed by the Office of the Commissioner of Income Tax, Appeal, Addl./JCIT(A), Bhubaneswar (hereinafter referred to as “Ld. CIT(A)”), dated 15.12.2025 under Section 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as “the Act”).
The Revenue has raised the following grounds of appeal:-
P a g e | 2 Banwari Lal Bidawatka
Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the Ld. Addl.CIT(A) is justified in allowing the rebate U/s 87A of the Act, on STCG, when rebate U/s 87A of the Act is not available in respect of Income Tax payable on income chargeable to tax on special rates, which includes Short Term Capital
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 87A
- Income Tax Officer, Jhunjhunu vs Shashi Kant Tulsian, JhunjhunuITA 620/JPR/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed6 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Income Tax Officer, Jhunjhunu vs Shashi Kant Tulsian, JhunjhunuITA 620/JPR/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed6 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Syed Kabeer Hussain, Bangalore, Karnataka vs Income Tax Officer Ward -7(2)(1) Bangalore…ITA 1540/BANG/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed23 Sept 2026AY 2024-25
- Shrey Jain, Jodhpur vs AO, JodhpurITA 124/JODH/2026[2024-2025]Status: Disposed14 Sept 2026AY 2024-2025
- ITO, Jaipur vs Kailash Mamodia, JaipurITA 1158/JPR/2026[2025]Status: Disposed11 Sept 2026
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Nagarbhavi Club (R) vs. The State Of KarnatakaKarnataka · 6 Oct 2026
- Newton Engineering And Chemicals Limited vs. Indian Oil Corporation LTD.Delhi · 6 Oct 2026
- Life Insurance Corporation Of INDIA vs. N.S. Associates PVT. LTDDelhi · 6 Oct 2026
- M/S Ideal Pharma, Through Its Proprietor Manish Kumar vs. The Union Of INDIA Through The Secretary, Ministry Of Finance, Department Of RevenueJharkhand · 6 Oct 2026
- Tvl.Surya Agro Fuels vs. The Commissioner Of Commercial TaxesMadras · 6 Oct 2026