JAGDISHBHAI MANSINH SOLANKI,ANAND vs. ITO WARD-3, GANDHIDHAM (BHUJ-1), BHUJ
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the reopening of assessment was barred by limitation as the escaped income was below the threshold of Rs. 50 lakhs required for reopening after three years, as per Section 149(1)(b) of the Income Tax Act.
What were the facts?
The assessee claimed a deduction under Section 80GGC for donations made to a political party. The assessment was reopened after three years, based on information from a search related to political donation rackets. The alleged escaped income was Rs. 3,40,000.
What were the issues?
Whether the reassessment proceedings initiated after three years were valid when the escaped income was below Rs. 50 lakhs. Whether the disallowance of deduction under Section 80GGC and consequential additions were justified.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 147,Section 148,Section 149(1)(b),Section 80GGC,Section 69C,Section 115BBE,Section 270A,Section 271AAC,Section 234B
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “SMC”
Before: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini
Per, Dr. Arjun Lal Saini, AM: The present appeal has been filed by the assessee, against the order passed by the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeal), National Faceless Appeal, Centre (NFAC), Delhi [hereinafter referred to as “CIT(A)”] dated 04.03.2026, arising in the matter of assessment order passed u/s 147 read with section 144B of the Income Tax Act, 1961 dated 10.12.2024, relevant to the Assessment Year 2019-20. 2. Grounds of the appeal raised by the assessee are as follows:
Th
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Dillip Kumar Behera vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, Mayurbhanj CircleOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Tvl.Dev Construction vs. The Proper OfficerMadras · 15 Oct 2026
- Abbal Dass Arya vs. Commissioner State Goods And Services Tax CommissionerUttarakhand · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S Darbesh Medical Enterprise vs. State Of West Bengal And Ors.Calcutta · 15 Oct 2026
- J M Mhatre Infra PVT. LTD Thr. Authorized Chetan J. Mhatre vs. Union Of INDIA Thr. Secretary Dept. Of Revenue Ministry Of Finance And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026