COOPERATIVE CANE DEVELOPMENT UNION LTD GANAULI,GANAULI RAUZA GAON vs. ASSESSMENT UNIT INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT, ASSESSING OFFICER NFAC DELHI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal followed its previous decisions and restored the matter to the Assessing Officer for re-computation of the admissible deduction under Section 80P. This was to consider interest earned on investments made in accordance with specific sections of the U.P. Cooperative Societies Act.
What were the facts?
The assessee, a cooperative society, claimed a deduction under Section 80P for commission and interest income. The Assessing Officer disallowed this claim, and the National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC) upheld the disallowance. The assessee appealed to the ITAT.
What were the issues?
Whether interest income on deposits and commission income earned by a cooperative society are eligible for deduction under Section 80P, and whether such income is attributable to the society's main activities.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 80P,Section 139,Section 143(3),Section 144,Section 270A,Section 272A(1)(d)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, SMC BENCH, LUCKNOW
Before: SHRI. SUDHANSHU SRIVASTAVA
This appeal has been preferred by the Assessee against the order dated 12.03.2026, passed by the National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi (NFAC) for Assessment Year 2022-23. 2.0 The brief facts of the case are that the assessee filed its return of income for the year under consideration under section 139 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter called 'the Act’) on 01.10.202, declaring Nil income and claiming deduction of Rs.2,72,69,086/- under section 80P of the Act. The case of the assessee was selected for scrutiny. After considering the replies furnished by the assessee in response to the statutory notices issued by the Assessing Officer (AO), the AO disallowed the claim of the assessee towards deduction under section 80P(2)(a)(iii) of the Act being the commission income of Rs.2,63,53,904/- and ITA No.472/LKW/2026 Page 2
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 80P
- Shree Bandharda Seva Sahkari Mandli Ltd… vs Income Tax Officer Ward -4, JunagadhITA 881/RJT/2025[2019-20]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Duddukuru Primary Agricultural Cooperative… vs ITO, Ward - 1, TadepalligudemITA 258/VIZ/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Parthasaradhi Mutually Aided Co-Operative… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward-17(1), HyderabadITA 2322/HYD/2026[AY 2016-17]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026
- Jijamata Mahila Gramin Bigar Sheti Sahakari… vs ITO Ward -1, BhandraITA 102/NAG/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed12 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Shri Na vs Ari Khedut Sahkari Society Ltd…ITA 362/SRT/2025[2016-17]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2016-17
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Hindustan Coca-Cola Beverages PVT. LTD. vs. The Commissioner, CGST And Cx, Dibrugarh And AnrGauhati · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Shree Sushruta Health Services Private Limited vs. The Union Of INDIAPatna · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Rst Batteries vs. Deputy Commissioner CGST Delhi West & Ors.Delhi · 14 Oct 2026
- Dr.Sunil Kumar Padhi vs. The Chief Commissioner, GST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- N.K Fashion Through It Proprietor Mr. Narender Agarwal vs. Assistant Commissioner Of Central Goods And Service Tax, Delhi EastDelhi · 14 Oct 2026