GENPACT INFRASTRUCTURE (HYDERABAD) PVT. LTD.,DELHI vs. ITO, NEW DELHI
What were the facts?
The assessee, Genpact Infrastructure (Hyderabad) Pvt. Ltd., was amalgamated with another entity. Despite this, assessment orders and transfer pricing orders were passed in the name of the non-existent erstwhile entity. The assessee had also raised grounds regarding the imputation of interest on receivables and the exclusion of foreign exchange gains from Section 10AA deduction.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal admitted an additional ground challenging the validity of the assessment orders as they were passed in the name of a non-existent entity. The Tribunal found it undisputed that the assessee company had ceased to exist post-amalgamation and had communicated this fact.
What were the issues?
Whether assessment orders passed in the name of a non-existent, amalgamated entity are void ab initio. The validity of transfer pricing adjustments and the eligibility of foreign exchange gains for Section 10AA deduction were also issues.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 10AA,Section 92CA,Section 143(2),Section 142(1),Section 250,Section 234B
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCHES “I” NEW DELHI
Per Kavitha Rajagopal, J M:
This appeal is filed by the assessee, challenging the order of the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [‘Ld. CIT(A)’ for short], passed u/s 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (‘the Act', for short), pertaining to the Assessment Year (‘A.Y.’ for short) 2009-10. 2
The assessee has raised the following grounds of appeal:- “1. That on the facts and the circumstances of the case and in law, the order passed by the Hon’ble Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) (‘CIT(A)’)/Ld. AO is bad in law.
The Ld. CIT(A)/Ld. AO, erred both
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 10AA
- Quantium Analytics Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward 16(3), HyderabadITA 1336/HYD/2024[2021-22]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2021-22
- Ab Knowledge Systems, Pune vs DCIT, PuneITA 92/PUN/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed25 Sept 2026AY 2020-21
- ACIT-Circle-4(1)(1), Bangalore vs Eygbs(India) Private Limited, BangaloreITA 1886/BANG/2024[2012-13]Status: Disposed21 Sept 2026AY 2012-13
- ACIT 15(1)(2), Mumbai vs Galaxy Surfactants Limited, MumbaiITA 6984/MUM/2025[2011-2012]Status: Disposed15 Sept 2026AY 2011-2012
- Chella Software Private Limited, Madurai vs The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 1833/CHNY/2026[2022-23]Status: Disposed2 Sept 2026AY 2022-23
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Rajesh Kumar Shaw vs. Assistant Commissioner, State Tax, Ballygunge Charge And OrsCalcutta · 6 Oct 2026
- M/S Shreya Steel Corporation vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of Revenue, Bally And Salkia Charge And OrsCalcutta · 6 Oct 2026
- M/S Shreya Steel Corporation vs. The Deputy Commissioner Of Revenue, Bally And Salkia Charge And OrsCalcutta · 6 Oct 2026
- Samir Halder vs. State Of West Bengal And Ors.Calcutta · 6 Oct 2026
- Rajesh Kumar Shaw vs. Assistant Commissioner, State Tax, Ballygunge Charge And OrsCalcutta · 6 Oct 2026