ACIT 15(1)(2), MUMBAI, MUMBAI vs. GALAXY SURFACTANTS LIMITED, MUMBAI
What were the facts?
The Assessing Officer capitalized interest expenditure, treated REACH registration charges as capital, and reallocated power/fuel expenses. The CIT(A) deleted these additions/disallowances, which the Revenue appealed.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s order, finding no direct nexus for capitalizing interest, that REACH charges were revenue for existing business, and that power/fuel reallocation lacked justification. Consistency with prior years' rulings was emphasized.
What were the issues?
Whether interest expenditure is to be capitalized, if REACH registration charges are capital or revenue, and if power/fuel expenses were correctly reallocated between EOU and non-EOU units.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Heard together (2 matters)
Read from the judgment's own cause title. This page is filed under one of them.
INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI BENCHES, MUMBAI BENCH: G BEFORE SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI PRABHASH SHANKAR, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA 6984/MUM/2025 निर्धारण वर्ा/Assessment Year: 2011-2012) ACIT 15(1)(2), MUMBAI GALAXY SURFACTANTS LIMITED ROOM NO 126B, 1ST FLOOR, AYAKAR BHAVAN, M K ROAD, C-49/2, GALAXY RESEARCH MUMBAI-400020, MUMBAI-400020, CENTRE, TTC INDUSTRIAL MAHARASHTRA AREA, PAWNE VILLAGE, NAVI Vs. MUMBAI , THANE , 19- MAHARASHTRA, 91-INDIA, 400703 MUMBAI-400703, MAHARASHTRA अपीलधर्थी Appellant प्रत्यर्थी Respondent CO 25/MUM/2026 निर्धारण वर्ा/Assessment Year: 2011-2012) GALAXY SURFACTANTS ACIT 15(1)(2), MUMBAI LIMITED ROOM NO 126B, 1ST FLOOR, C-49/2, GALAXY RESEARCH AYAKAR BHAVAN, M K ROAD, CENTRE, TTC INDUSTRIAL AREA, MUMBAI-400020 PAWNE VILLAGE, NAVI MUMBAI Vs. MUMBAI-400020, , THANE , 19-MAHARASHTRA, 91- MAHARASHTRA INDIA, 400703, MUMBAI-400703, MAHARASHTRA अपीलधर्थी Appellant प्रत्यर्थी Respondent
Permanent Account Number of Assessee: AAACG1539P
अपीलधर्थी द्वारा/Appellant represented by: Shri Basavaraj Hiremath - CIT DR प्रत्यर्थी द्वारा/Respondent represented by: Ms. Shubhashree, ADV. (Virtually Appear)
सुनवाई की तारीख / Date of conclusion of h
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 10B
- Brainbees Solutions Limited, Pune… vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITTPA 1431/PUN/2026[2022-2023]Status: Disposed29 Sept 2026AY 2022-2023
- Ivl Dhunseri Petrochem Industries Pvt… vs D.C.I.T., Circle - 11(1), KolkataITTPA 4/KOL/2026[2022-2023]Status: Heard11 Sept 2026AY 2022-2023
- T vs Motor Co. Ltd., Chennaivs.DCIT, Corp…ITTPA 52/CHNY/2026[2022-23]Status: Disposed9 Sept 2026AY 2022-23
- Vrajlal Chanabhai Kachhadiya, Jamnagar vs ITO, Ward-2(6), JamnagarITA 847/RJT/2025[2010-11]Status: Disposed7 Sept 2026AY 2010-11
- Mindtickle Interactive Media Pvt.Ltd, Pune vs DCIT Circle-7 Pne-C-1 (58), PuneITTPA 242/PUN/2026[2022-23]Status: Disposed2 Sept 2026AY 2022-23
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Sri Kamatchi Agencies vs. The Deputy Commissioner (Appeal)Madras · 6 Oct 2026
- Dr S.Surya Prakash vs. The Secretary TO GovernmentMadras · 6 Oct 2026
- Madhusudan Agarwal vs. Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax Midnapore Charge And Ors.Calcutta · 6 Oct 2026
- M/S Sanmargg Agrotrade INDIA Private Limtied And Anr. vs. Superintendent Central Tax Group-36 Circle-08 Office Of The Commissioner Of Central Tax And Ors.Calcutta · 6 Oct 2026
- Ramkrishna Datta vs. State Of West Bengal And Ors.Calcutta · 6 Oct 2026