JAGDISH BALKISHAN ASAWA,VALSAD vs. ITO, WARD 5, VAPI
What were the facts?
The assessee claimed HRA exemption, exemptions under Section 10(14), and a donation deduction under Section 80GGC. The Assessing Officer disallowed these claims due to lack of substantiation and disproportionate donation amount. The CIT(A) dismissed the assessee's appeal ex-parte.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal found that the CIT(A) passed an ex-parte order without providing proper opportunity to the assessee. Therefore, the matter was remanded back to the CIT(A) for fresh adjudication after giving the assessee an opportunity of hearing.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT(A) erred in dismissing the appeal ex-parte without granting a reasonable opportunity of hearing to the assessee. Whether the disallowances made by the Assessing Officer were justified.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 10(14),Section 80GGC,Section 143(2),Section 142(1),Section 143(3),Section 144B
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, SURAT BENCH, SURAT
Before: MS. SUCHITRA KAMBLE & SHRI B.M. BIYANI
PER : SUCHITRA KAMBLE, J M:
The appeal filed by the assessee is against the order passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi [in short “CIT(A)”] dated 17.12.2025 for the Assessment Year (in short “AY”) 2023-24. 2. The assessee has raised the following grounds of appeal:
“1. Learned CIT(A) erred in law and on facts in dismissing appeal ex-parte without appreciating the facts and circumstances of the case. 2
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 10(14)
- Siddharth Balukeswar Sar, Navi Mumbai vs Assessing Officer, MumbaiITA 4050/MUM/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed18 Jun 2026AY 2019-20
- Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax, Central… vs Niti Arya, MumbaiITA 5965/DEL/2025[2019-20]Status: Disposed5 May 2026AY 2019-20
- Pritam Shrikant Parvatkar, Pune vs DCIT, Circle-12, PuneITA 2526/PUN/2025[2015-16]Status: Disposed15 Dec 2025AY 2015-16
- Pritam Shrikant Parvatkar, Pune vs DCIT, Cir-12, PuneITA 2525/PUN/2025[2015-16]Status: Disposed15 Dec 2025AY 2015-16
- Sharad Sinha, Bangalore vs ACIT, Circle 17(1), MumbaiITA 4325/MUM/2025[2016-2017]Status: Disposed7 Oct 2025AY 2016-2017
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Sri Kamatchi Agencies vs. The Deputy Commissioner (Appeal)Madras · 6 Oct 2026
- Dr S.Surya Prakash vs. The Secretary TO GovernmentMadras · 6 Oct 2026
- Madhusudan Agarwal vs. Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax Midnapore Charge And Ors.Calcutta · 6 Oct 2026
- M/S Sanmargg Agrotrade INDIA Private Limtied And Anr. vs. Superintendent Central Tax Group-36 Circle-08 Office Of The Commissioner Of Central Tax And Ors.Calcutta · 6 Oct 2026
- Ramkrishna Datta vs. State Of West Bengal And Ors.Calcutta · 6 Oct 2026