RADHE RENEWABLE ENERGY DEVELOPMENT PVT LTD,RAJKOT vs. THE ACIT, CIRCLE-1(1), RAJKOT, RAJKOT
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that disallowance under Section 14A is not warranted in the absence of exempt income. Regarding the loan additions, the Tribunal found that the assessee had discharged its onus by providing identity, genuineness, and creditworthiness of the creditor, and therefore, the additions were deleted.
What were the facts?
The assessee appealed against disallowance of expenses under Section 14A and additions made on account of alleged fictitious loans and commission. The assessee argued that no exempt income was earned, and the loan transactions were genuine and supported by documentary evidence.
What were the issues?
Whether disallowance under Section 14A is justified without exempt income, and whether additions for alleged fictitious loans and commission are sustainable when the assessee proves identity, genuineness, and creditworthiness of the creditor.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 14A,Section 8D,Section 143(3),Section 147,Section 148,Section 68,Section 131,Section 133(6)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Rajkot Bench, Rajkot
Before: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini & Shri Sonjoy Sarma
Per, Dr. Arjun Lal Saini, AM: Captioned two appeals filed by the assessee, pertaining to assessment years (AY) 2013-14 & 2016-17, are directed against the order under section 250 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’) passed by the National Faceless Appeal Centre (NAC) Delhi/Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) [in short ‘NFAC/Ld.CIT(A)’], dated 12.02.2026, which in turn arises out of an
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 14A
- Blacksoil Capital Private Limited (As… vs DCIT, Circle-1(1), HyderabadITA 2217/HYD/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- Hiral Construction, Mumbai vs ITO Ward 42(1)(2), MumbaiITA 8431/MUM/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- The Dy DIT (It) 1(2), Mumbai vs M/S Citi Bank N.A, MumbaiITA 4981/MUM/2007[2002-2003]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2002-2003
- M/S. Citi Bank N.A., Mumbai vs The Addl DIT (It) RG-1, MumbaiITA 4970/MUM/2007[2002-2003]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2002-2003
- M/S American Express Bank Ltd., Mumbai vs The Jt DIT (It)1(1), MumbaiITA 9414/MUM/2004[2000-2001]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2000-2001
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Md. Akhtar Ansari, Proprietor Of M/S Indian Associates vs. State Of Jharkhand, Through Commissioner Of State Tax, Commercial Tax Dept.Jharkhand · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S. Amarjothi Granites (INDIA) PVT. LTD., Berhampur, Ganjam vs. The Commissioner, Commercial Tax And GST, Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S. Mishka Steels LLP And Anr. vs. The Superintendent Of Central Goods And Service Tax, Cx, Range-Ii, Behala Div. And Ors.Calcutta · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Gujarat Co-Operative Milk Marketing Federation Limited vs. Union Of INDIAGujarat · 14 Oct 2026
- Ramesh K Devadiga vs. Khernagar Nandadeep Co Operative Housing Society LTDBombay · 14 Oct 2026