DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1(1), PUNE, PUNE vs. BHAIRAVNATH SUGAR WORKS LIMITED, PUNE
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeals, finding that the CIT(A) was justified in deleting the addition. The facts of the instant appeals were identical to previous years where similar grounds were dismissed.
What were the facts?
The assessee claimed substantial rent expenses for its corporate office. The Assessing Officer disallowed the expenses, suspecting the premises were not fully utilized by the assessee and were occupied by related entities. The CIT(A) deleted the addition.
What were the issues?
Whether the rent paid to a related party for corporate office space is an allowable business expenditure. Whether the assessee discharged the onus to prove the expenditure was wholly and exclusively for business purposes.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, PUNE BENCH “A”, PUNE
Before: SHRI R. K. PANDA & Ms. ASTHA CHANDRA
PER R.K. PANDA, VICE PRESIDENT :
ITA No.392/PUN/2026 filed by the Revenue is directed against the order dated 04.11.2025 of the Ld. CIT(A) / NFAC, Delhi relating to Assessment Year 2014-15. ITA No.393/PUN/2026 filed by the Revenue is directed against the order dated 04.11.2025 of the Ld. CIT(A) / 2016-17. ITA No.374/PUN/2026 filed by the Revenue is directed against the order dated 03.11.2025 of the Ld. CIT(A) / NFAC, Delhi relating to Assessment Year 2017-18. ITA No.3164/PUN/2025 filed by the Revenue is directed against the or
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 40A(2)
- Bellsonica Auto Component India Private… vs ACIT, Circle-1(1), GurgaonITA 1041/DEL/2023[2015-16]Status: Disposed7 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Pramod Lakra, Deputy Commissioner of Income… vs M/S. Shree Baidyanath Ayurved Bhawan Pvt…ITA 2692/KOL/2025[2021-22]Status: Disposed28 Sept 2026AY 2021-22
- DCIT, Circle-11(1), Kolkata vs Shree Baidyanath Ayurved Bhawan Pvt Ltd…ITA 2691/KOL/2025[2020-21]Status: Disposed28 Sept 2026AY 2020-21
- Shree Baidyanath Ayurved Bhawan Private… vs DCIT, Circle 11(1), KolkataITA 1033/KOL/2025[2021-2022]Status: Disposed28 Sept 2026AY 2021-2022
- Shree Baidyanath Ayurved Bhawan Private… vs DCIT, Circle 11(1), KolkataITA 1032/KOL/2025[2020-2021]Status: Disposed28 Sept 2026AY 2020-2021
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Md. Akhtar Ansari, Proprietor Of M/S Indian Associates vs. State Of Jharkhand, Through Commissioner Of State Tax, Commercial Tax Dept.Jharkhand · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S. Amarjothi Granites (INDIA) PVT. LTD., Berhampur, Ganjam vs. The Commissioner, Commercial Tax And GST, Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S. Mishka Steels LLP And Anr. vs. The Superintendent Of Central Goods And Service Tax, Cx, Range-Ii, Behala Div. And Ors.Calcutta · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Gujarat Co-Operative Milk Marketing Federation Limited vs. Union Of INDIAGujarat · 14 Oct 2026
- Ramesh K Devadiga vs. Khernagar Nandadeep Co Operative Housing Society LTDBombay · 14 Oct 2026