RAJENDRA BABASAHEB WABALE,NASHIK vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION), NASHIK
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the AO failed to prove any cash payment by the assessee. The document relied upon by the AO did not mention any cash payment and lacked evidentiary value.
What were the facts?
The assessee, an NRI, purchased an immovable property using banking channels from his NRE account. The AO alleged cash payments to the builder based on documents found during a search in the builder's case, without showing these documents to the assessee.
What were the issues?
Whether the addition made by the AO on account of alleged cash payment is baseless and without evidence, and whether the onus was on the Revenue to prove such payment.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, PUNE BENCH “SMC”, PUNE
Before: SHRI Dr. DIPAK P. RIPOTE & SHRI VINAY BHAMORE
PER Dr. DIPAK P. RIPOTE, A.M : This is an appeal filed by the assessee against the order of the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Pune-13 Ld.CIT(A)], passed u/s. 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (‘the Act’) for AY 2023-24 on 13/11/2025, emanating from the Assessment Order u/s 143(3) r.w.s. 144C(3) of the Act, dated 07/03/2025. Submission of Ld.AR :
Ld. Authorised representative for the Assessee Advocate Deepa Khare submitted that Assessee was NRI during the relevant period. Assessee is Ex-Serviceman retired from Indian Navy. During the year the assessee was working on M.V. Darya Sindhu & Mira Indian Ship. During the year Assessee purchased an immovable property by p
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 144C(3)
- Radhakishan Potharajula, Karim Nagar vs ITO (Int Taxn)-2, HyderabadITA 2340/HYD/2025[2016-17]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2016-17
- Neha Hiranand Motwani, Nashik vs ITO International Tax, NashikITA 1570/PUN/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed5 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- ACIT-Circle 6(1)(1) Mumbai, Mumbai vs Aditya Birla Real Estate Limited, MumbaiITA 7767/MUM/2026[2013-14]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2013-14
- ACIT-Circle6(1)(1) Mumbai., Mumbai vs Aditya Birla Real Estate Limited, MumbaiITA 7766/MUM/2026[2016-17]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2016-17
- Atc Tires Private Limited, Mumbai vs The Principal Commissioner of Income-Tax…ITA 6468/MUM/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed23 Sept 2026AY 2020-21
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Sanjay Maheshwari vs. Union Of INDIA & Ors.Delhi · 14 Oct 2026
- Iyyanan Eswaran vs. The Appellate Deputy Commissioner (St) (GST)Madras · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Dc Security Services vs. Commissioner Of Central Goods And Services TaxUttarakhand · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Shreekanth Enterprises vs. Joint Commissioner AppealsUttarakhand · 14 Oct 2026
- Sharad Ashok Agarwal vs. State Of Maharashtra Through G.P. And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026