VERIFONE INDIA TECHNOLOGY PRIVATE LIMITED,BENGALURU vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-7(1)(1), BENGALURU
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to pass an appeal-effect order within 15 days, considering the assessee's claim that margins fall within the permissible range after the CIT(A)'s order. The assessee is granted liberty to seek revival of the appeal if still aggrieved.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against the CIT(A)'s order which partly allowed their appeal against the assessment order. The CIT(A) later passed an order under Section 154 deleting a negative working capital adjustment, making the assessee's margin fall within the arm's length range.
What were the issues?
Whether the transfer pricing adjustment survives after the deletion of negative working capital adjustment by the CIT(A) and the subsequent appeal-effect order.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 143(3),Section 144C(3),Section 92CA,Section 92C(3),Section 250,Section 154,Section 234B
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, BANGALORE BENCHES, BANGALORE
Before: SHRI PRASHANT MAHARISHI & SHRI SOUNDARARAJAN K.
PER SHRI PRASHANT MAHARISHI, VICE PRESIDENT
ITA 1879/BANG/2024 VERIFONE INDIA TECHNOLOGY PRIVATE LIMITED VeriFone India Technology Private Limited (the 01. assessee/appellant) has filed this appeal for assessment year 2013–14 against the appellate order dated 30 July 2024 passed by the Commissioner of I
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 144C(3)
- Radhakishan Potharajula, Karim Nagar vs ITO (Int Taxn)-2, HyderabadITA 2340/HYD/2025[2016-17]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2016-17
- Neha Hiranand Motwani, Nashik vs ITO International Tax, NashikITA 1570/PUN/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed5 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- ACIT-Circle 6(1)(1) Mumbai, Mumbai vs Aditya Birla Real Estate Limited, MumbaiITA 7767/MUM/2026[2013-14]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2013-14
- ACIT-Circle6(1)(1) Mumbai., Mumbai vs Aditya Birla Real Estate Limited, MumbaiITA 7766/MUM/2026[2016-17]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2016-17
- Atc Tires Private Limited, Mumbai vs The Principal Commissioner of Income-Tax…ITA 6468/MUM/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed23 Sept 2026AY 2020-21
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- A.Merchy Clara vs. The Commissioner Of GST And Central Excise (Appeals)Madras · 13 Oct 2026
- Nallathambi Thangaraj vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer - IMadras · 13 Oct 2026
- Iyyanan Eswaran vs. The Appellate Deputy Commissioner (St) (GST)Madras · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S. Hira Films PVT. LTD. vs. M/S. Prasad Film Labs (Mumbai) Private LimitedBombay · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Jung Bahadur Singh, Through Its Proprietor, Jang Bahadur Singh vs. The Union Of INDIA, Through Its Secretary, Ministry Of Finance, Department Of RevenueJharkhand · 13 Oct 2026