ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE, KARNAL vs. MAHARISHI MARKANDESHWAR TRUST, AMBALA CITY
What were the facts?
The Revenue appealed against the CIT(A)'s order which treated a Development Fund of Rs. 13,32,42,321/- as corpus donation. The assessee, a charitable trust running educational institutions, had collected this fund from students for capital expenditure.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal followed its own previous order in the assessee's own case, which held that development fees collected for specific capital expenditure should be treated as corpus receipts under Section 11(1)(d). Therefore, the CIT(A)'s decision to treat the fund as corpus was upheld.
What were the issues?
Whether the Development Fund collected by the assessee constitutes a corpus donation or a revenue receipt, and if it qualifies for exemption under Section 11(1)(d).
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI
Before: SHRI M BALAGANESH & SHRI SUDHIR KUMAR
PER SHRI SUDHIR KUMAR, JM :
This appeal by the Revenue is directed against the orders of the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals)-3, Gurgaon [hereinafter referred to as “Ld.CIT(A)”] vide order dated 04-07-2023 relevant to assessment year 2020-21. 2. The Revenue has raised the following ground in appeal as under:
Whether the CIT(A) has erred in law and on facts in holding that the amount of Rs. 13,32,42,321/- received towards the ‘Devel
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 11(1)(d)
- Indian Roads Congress, New Delhi vs Income Tax Exemption, Ward 1(2), New DelhiITA 1516/DEL/2026[2012 - 2013]Status: Disposed29 Sept 2026
- Sanskruti Vistarak Sangh, Mumbai vs D/ACIT Exemption Circle-2, MumbaiITA 5139/MUM/2025[2013-14]Status: Disposed8 Sept 2026AY 2013-14
- Sanskruti Vistarak Sangh, Mumbai vs ACIT (Exemption) Circle-2, MumbaiITA 5138/MUM/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed8 Sept 2026AY 2017-18
- Tripura Cricket Association, Chowmuhani… vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 90/GTY/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed25 Aug 2026AY 2017-18
- Msme Technology Centre, Visakhapatnam vs Income Tax Officer, VijayawadaITA 607/VIZ/2025[2022-23]Status: Disposed21 Aug 2026AY 2022-23
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Prakash Enterprises Its Proprietor Sudhir Kumar Choudhary vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 6 Oct 2026
- M/S Sree Narayan Construction vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 6 Oct 2026
- M/S Recro Furniture Private Limited vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 6 Oct 2026
- Ipca Laboratories LTD. vs. Union Of INDIA Through The Jt. Secretary, Dept. Of Revenue, Ministry Of Finance And OrsBombay · 6 Oct 2026
- Scottment Alco Bev Fillers PVT LTD vs. State Of ChhattisgarhChhattisgarh · 5 Oct 2026