MINA MANOJ AGRAWAL,VADODARA vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 3(1)(1), VADODARA

ITA 470/AHD/2026Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad18 September 2026AY 2021-2210 pages
AI SummaryPartly Allowed

What were the facts?

The assessee filed returns under the old tax regime and later opted for the new tax regime by filing Form 10-IE belatedly for AY 2021-22. For AY 2022-23 and 2023-24, the assessee contended that the earlier Form 10-IE filing was sufficient for opting into the new tax regime for subsequent years.

What did the Tribunal hold?

For AY 2021-22, the tribunal held that while the new tax regime option was invalid due to belated filing, the assessee was entitled to Chapter VI-A deductions under the old tax regime. For AY 2022-23 and 2023-24, the tribunal held that filing Form 10-IE once is sufficient for subsequent years, and the returns should be treated under the new tax regime.

What were the issues?

Whether the belated filing of Form 10-IE for AY 2021-22 invalidates the new tax regime option and if Chapter VI-A deductions are allowable. Whether a single filing of Form 10-IE is sufficient for subsequent assessment years under the new tax regime.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 115BAC,Section 139,Section 250

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Heard together (3 matters)

ITA 470/AHD/2026
ITA 471/AHD/2026
ITA 472/AHD/2026

Read from the judgment's own cause title. This page is filed under one of them.

आयकर अपील"य अ"धकरण, अहमदाबाद पीठ", अहमदाबाद INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AHMEDABAD BENCHES, AHMEDABAD BENCH: SMC

BEFORE SHRI NARENDRA PRASAD SINHA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI SANJAY KUMAR, JUDICIAL MEMBER

1.

ITA 470/AHD/2026 (िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year: 2021-22) Mina Manoj Agrawal ITO Ward 3(1)(1) Mina Manoj Agrawal, A-14, Vadodara-390007, Vadodara-390019, Gujarat अपीलाथ" Appellant ""थ" Respondent PAN of Assessee: ANGPA3828F

अपीलाथ" "ारा/Appellant represented by: Shri Manan Agarwal, AR ""थ" "ारा/Respondent represented by: Shri Rakesh Rathi, Sr. Dr.

2.

ITA 471/AHD/2026 (िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year: 2022-23) Mina Manoj Agrawal] ITO Ward 3(1)(1) Mina Manoj Agrawal, A-14, Vadodara-390007, Vadodara-390019, Gujarat अपीलाथ" Appellant ""थ" Respondent PAN of Assessee: ANGPA3828F

अपीलाथ" "ारा/Appellant represented by: Shri Manan Agarwal, AR ""थ" "ारा/Respondent represented by: Shri Rakesh Rathi, Sr. Dr.

3.

ITA 472/AHD/2026 (िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year: 2023-24) Mina Manoj Agrawal] Vs. ITO

ITA 470, 471, 472/AHD/2026 AY- 2021-22, 2022-23, 2023-24

The order continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

Create a free accountSign in

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

More judgments on Section 115BAC

All 140 judgments and leading authorities on Section 115BAC →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →