SANDEEP,SONIPAT vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD-1, SONIPAT
What were the facts?
The assessee received enhanced interest income from the Land Acquisition Officer on compulsory acquisition of agricultural land. The Assessing Officer (AO) added 50% of this amount to the assessee's income, treating it as taxable interest. The Commissioner (Appeals) upheld this addition.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that interest received under Section 28 of the Land Acquisition Act is part of the enhanced compensation for agricultural land and is exempt from tax under Section 10(37) of the Income Tax Act, following Supreme Court precedents.
What were the issues?
Whether interest received on enhanced compensation under Section 28 of the Land Acquisition Act is taxable or exempt under Section 10(37) of the Income Tax Act.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 10(37),Section 194A,Section 28,Section 148,Section 143(2),Section 142(1),Section 56(2)(viii),Section 57(iv),Section 145A
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH ‘SMC’: NEW DELHI
PER S.RIFAUR RAHMAN,AM:
This appeal is filed by the assessee against the order passed by the ld. Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals)/National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi [for short ‘ld. CIT (A)] dated 08.01.2026 for the Assessment Year 2014-15. 2. Brief facts of the case are, Assessee has not filed its return of income. Based on the above, assessment was reopened. Based on the information available on AIMS module, the assessee has received cash of 2 Rs.35,33,013/- on account of interest under section 194A of the Income- tax Act, 1961 (for short ‘the Act’). Accordingly notice under section 148 was issued and served on the assessee. Subsequently, assessee filed its return of income as required under section 148 of the Act on 30.10.2021 electronically declaring
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 10(37)
- Rameshbhai Gordhanbhai Dudhagara, Rajkot vs Income Tax Officer, RajkotITA 738/RJT/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed29 Sept 2026AY 2017-18
- Rameshbhai Gordhanbhai Dudhagara, Rajkot vs Income Tax Officer, RajkotITA 738/RJT/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed29 Sept 2026AY 2017-18
- Naresh Kumar, Gurgaon, Haryana vs PCIT, JaipurITA 209/JPR/2024[2019-20]Status: Disposed28 Sept 2026AY 2019-20
- Sudhakar Purushottam Bhalerao, Osmanabad vs ITO Ward 1, LaturITA 2882/PUN/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed25 Sept 2026AY 2020-21
- Kumar Satish, Gurugram vs ITO Ward 2(2), GurugramITA 6552/DEL/2026[2014-15]Status: Disposed21 Sept 2026AY 2014-15
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Jitin Batra Proprietor Of M/S. Dreamz Conference And Event Management Group vs. Sales Tax Officer Class Ii / Avato Ward 60 & Ors.Delhi · 7 Oct 2026
- Madhusudan Saraogi vs. Assistant Commissioner Of Revenue, Howrah And Kadamtala Charge And Ors.Calcutta · 7 Oct 2026
- Neeraj Massey vs. Assistant CommissionerUttarakhand · 7 Oct 2026
- Padu Paraja vs. The Commnr. Of CT And GST, Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 7 Oct 2026
- The Lead Factory vs. The Assistant Commissoner Of Commercial TaxesKarnataka · 7 Oct 2026