RAMESHBHAI GORDHANBHAI DUDHAGARA,RAJKOT vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, RAJKOT
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal belatedly due to illness and lack of information from their tax consultant. The appeal concerned the taxability of interest received on enhanced compensation for compulsory acquisition of agricultural land.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal condoned the delay in filing the appeal. Following the jurisdictional High Court's precedent, the Tribunal held that interest on enhanced compensation for agricultural land is part of compensation and thus exempt from tax.
What were the issues?
Whether interest received on enhanced compensation for compulsory acquisition of agricultural land is taxable as revenue receipt or capital receipt. Whether the delay in filing the appeal should be condoned.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Rajkot Bench, Rajkot
Before: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini & Shri Sonjoy Sarma
Per, Dr. Arjun Lal Saini, AM : Captioned appeal filed by the assessee, pertaining to assessment year 2017-18, is directed against the order passed under section 250 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’) dated 28.07.2025 by the National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi/Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [in short ‘Ld.CIT(A)’] which in turn arises out of a
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 10(37)
- Rameshbhai Gordhanbhai Dudhagara, Rajkot vs Income Tax Officer, RajkotITA 738/RJT/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed29 Sept 2026AY 2017-18
- Naresh Kumar, Gurgaon, Haryana vs PCIT, JaipurITA 209/JPR/2024[2019-20]Status: Disposed28 Sept 2026AY 2019-20
- Sudhakar Purushottam Bhalerao, Osmanabad vs ITO Ward 1, LaturITA 2882/PUN/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed25 Sept 2026AY 2020-21
- Kumar Satish, Gurugram vs ITO Ward 2(2), GurugramITA 6552/DEL/2026[2014-15]Status: Disposed21 Sept 2026AY 2014-15
- Rakesh, Gurgaon vs Income Tax Officer, GurugramITA 5707/DEL/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed21 Sept 2026AY 2019-20
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Prakash Enterprises Its Proprietor Sudhir Kumar Choudhary vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 6 Oct 2026
- M/S Sree Narayan Construction vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 6 Oct 2026
- M/S Recro Furniture Private Limited vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 6 Oct 2026
- Ipca Laboratories LTD. vs. Union Of INDIA Through The Jt. Secretary, Dept. Of Revenue, Ministry Of Finance And OrsBombay · 6 Oct 2026
- Scottment Alco Bev Fillers PVT LTD vs. State Of ChhattisgarhChhattisgarh · 5 Oct 2026