ACIT, DELHI vs. ARCSERVE INDIA SOFTWARE SOLUTIONS PVT LTD, DELHI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that Section 194-IA is not applicable as no immovable property was acquired, thus upholding the deletion of disallowance under Section 40(a)(ia). It also held that the excess payment constituted goodwill for acquiring a running business and not unexplained expenditure, confirming the deletion of addition under Section 69C.
What were the facts?
The assessee acquired a business division on a slump sale basis and claimed goodwill. The Assessing Officer (AO) disallowed depreciation on goodwill and treated the excess payment as unexplained expenditure. The CIT(A) deleted the disallowance under Section 40(a)(ia) and addition under Section 69C but disallowed depreciation on goodwill.
What were the issues?
Whether depreciation on goodwill is allowable on a slump sale of a business division, and whether the excess payment over net assets constitutes unexplained expenditure.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 194-IA,Section 40(a)(ia),Section 69C,Section 32(1)(ii)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI “E” BENCHES, NEW DELHI
Before: SHRI MAHAVIR SINGH & SHRI MANISH AGARWAL
Heard together (2 matters)
Read from the judgment's own cause title. This page is filed under one of them.
PER MANISH AGARWAL, A.M.:
The captioned cross-appeals filed by the assessee and the Revenue against the order dated 19.06.2025 passed by Ld. Commissioner of
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 194-IA
- Sudershan Kumar Saini, Chandigarh vs ITO, Aaykar Bhawan, ChandigarhITA 673/CHANDI/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed1 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Girishkumar Natverlal Patel, Ahmedabad vs The ITO, Ward-2, TDS, AhmedabadITA 2572/AHD/2025[2019-20]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2019-20
- Arcserve Software Solutions Private… vs DCIT Circle 1(1), Delhi (Formally DCIT…ITA 5137/DEL/2025[2016-17]Status: Disposed18 Sept 2026AY 2016-17
- Rashmi Singh, Jaipur vs ITO, TDS-2, JaipurITA 694/JPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed25 Aug 2026AY 2019-20
- Divyakumar Bhisham Sawilani, Mumbai vs Income Tax Officer Int Tax Ward 4(2)(1)…ITITA 1777/MUM/2025[2022-23]Status: Disposed17 Aug 2026AY 2022-23
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Prabhudatta Mishra vs. The Commissioner Of Commercial Taxes And Goods And Services Tax, OdishaOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Rajesh Kumar Gupta vs. Joint Commissioner Of GST (Appeal), Territorial Range, BolangirOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S. Attitude Exim PVT. LTD., Rourkela vs. The Commissioner Of CT And GST, CuttackOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S.Pradeep Kumar Mahapatra, Bhubaneswar vs. Superintendent Bhubaneswar-Iii Circle, CGST Range, BhubaneswarOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Dillip Kumar Behera vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, Mayurbhanj CircleOrissa · 15 Oct 2026