THE DY. COMMR. INCOME TAX, TDS CIRCLE, RAJKOT-GUJARAT vs. M/S CLASSIC NETWORK PVT. LTD., RAJKOT-GUJARAT
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the assessee had a bonafide belief that TDS was not deductible, supported by consistent past assessments where no disallowance was made. The Revenue failed to provide evidence of middlemen involvement or contradict the royalty payment claims.
What were the facts?
The Revenue appealed against the deletion of additions made under sections 201(1) and 201(1A) by the Assessing Officer (AO) for non-deduction of TDS on labor charges and royalty payments. The assessee claimed that payments to individual laborers did not exceed the threshold and royalty was paid to government agencies.
What were the issues?
Whether the assessee is liable for TDS default for non-deduction on labor charges and royalty payments despite a bonafide belief and consistent past treatment.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 201,Section 201(1),Section 201(1A),Section 194C,Section 194J
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(1)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- 254 ITR 121 (Guj) ITO v. Gujarat Narmada Valley Fertilizers Co. Ltd.173 citing247 ITR 305 · 2000 · HC
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, RAJKOT BENCH, RAJKOT
Before: SHRI WASEEM AHMED
Heard together (2 matters)
Read from the judgment's own cause title. This page is filed under one of them.
PER WASEEM AHMED ACCOUNTANT MEMBER:
The captioned two appeals have been filed at the instance of the Revenue against the orders of the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-II, Rajkot [Ld.CIT(A) in short] dated 28/08/2014 and 30/06/2018 arising in the matter of assessment order passed under s.201(1) and 201(1A) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (here-in-after referred to as "the Act") dated
ITA nos.628-375/Rjt/2014-2015 Asstt. Years 2012-13 & 2013-14 2
19/03/2014 and
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 201
- Sbi, (Erstwhile Sbbj), Baran vs ITO (TDS), KotaITA 143/JPR/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- Santosh Kumar Bhogi, Visakhapatnam vs Deputy Commissioner of Income-Tax…ITA 253/VIZ/2026[2023-24]Status: Disposed1 Oct 2026AY 2023-24
- Raj Construction, Vadodara vs The ITO, Ward TDS-2, VadodaraITA 327/AHD/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2018-19
- Himanshusinhji Jyotendrasinhji Jadeja… vs DCIT/ACIT Circle-1(1), RKT, RajkotITA 325/RJT/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed29 Sept 2026AY 2018-19
- Jagadish Panchal, Udaipur vs Additional Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 314/JODH/2024[2016-17]Status: Disposed29 Sept 2026AY 2016-17
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Dillip Kumar Behera vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, Mayurbhanj CircleOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Tvl.Dev Construction vs. The Proper OfficerMadras · 15 Oct 2026
- Abbal Dass Arya vs. Commissioner State Goods And Services Tax CommissionerUttarakhand · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S Darbesh Medical Enterprise vs. State Of West Bengal And Ors.Calcutta · 15 Oct 2026
- J M Mhatre Infra PVT. LTD Thr. Authorized Chetan J. Mhatre vs. Union Of INDIA Thr. Secretary Dept. Of Revenue Ministry Of Finance And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026