THE ITO, KOCHI vs. M/S.SPECTRUM SOFT TECH SOLUTIONS P. LTD, KOCHI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that based on CBDT Circular No. 3/2018 and the jurisdictional High Court's judgment, appeals with a tax effect below Rs. 20 lakhs should not be filed.
What were the facts?
The Revenue filed appeals before the ITAT for assessment years 2012-13 and 2015-16. Both parties agreed that the tax effect in these appeals was less than Rs. 20 lakhs.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was the maintainability of the Revenue's appeals before the ITAT given the low tax effect, in light of CBDT circulars and judicial precedents.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, COCHIN BENCH, COCHIN
Before: Shri Chandra Poojari, AM & Shri George George K, JM
Per BENCH:
These appeals filed by the Revenue are directed against the order of the
Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals)-I, Kochi dated 14/08/2018 and pertain
to the assessment years 2012-13 & 2015-16.
At the time of hearing, both the parties stated that the tax effect in these
appeals were less than Rs. 20 lakhs and therefore, Circular No. 3/2018 dated
11.07.2018 issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) in exercise of its
power vested under Sec. 268A(1) of the I.T. Act would come into play, wherein,
the monetary limit for filing the appeals by the Revenue before the ITAT and
various High Courts as well as Apex Court were revised with an object of
reducing the tax litigation. Vide para 3 of the said circular (supra), it is stated
that in cases where the tax effect in the appeal to be filed before the Appellate
2 ITA No.509&510/Coch/2018.
Tribunal does not exceed Rs. 20 lakhs, appeal should not be filed. Thus, taking
note of CBDT Circular No. 03/2018 dated 11.07.2018 and also the judgment of
the Jurisdictional High Court in the case of CIT vs. Tata Ceramics Ltd. (102 CCH
0094) and considering the fact that the tax effect in the instant appeals is less
than Rs. 20 lakhs, the present appeals deserve to be dismissed as not
maintainable.
Accordingly in the light of CBDT Circular No. 03/2018 dated 11.07.2018,
the appeals stand dismissed.
In the result, the appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed. Order pronounced on this 21st March, 2019.
sd/- sd/- (GEORGE GEORGE K.) (CHANDRA POOJARI) JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER
Place: Kochi Dated : 21st March, 2019 GJ Copy to: 1. M/s. Spectrum Soft Tech solutions Pvt. Ltd., Mahakavi G. Road, Karakkamuri, Kochi-682 011. 2. The Income Tax officer, Corporate Ward-2(1), Kochi. 3. The Commissioner of Income-tax(Appeals)-I, Kochi. 4. The Pr. Commissioner of Income-tax, Kochi. 5. D.R., I.T.A.T. Cochin Bench, Kochi. 6. Guard File. By Order
(Assistant Registrar) I.T.A.T., Cochin Bench
More judgments on Section 268A
- Income Tax Officer, Ajmer vs Hemant Kumar Sharma, AjmerITA 1506/JPR/2026[2021-22]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Income Tax Officer, Indore vs Aashta Doshi, IndoreITA 789/IND/2025[2024-25]Status: Disposed12 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Income Tax Officer Ward -1(2)(3), Ahmedabad vs Khushal Madhavlal Darji, AhmedabadITA 82/AHD/2026[2022-23]Status: Disposed25 Sept 2026AY 2022-23
- Income Tax Officer, Ward-1, Mehsana vs Hemantkumar Faljibhai Chaudhary, MehsanaITA 475/AHD/2025[2012-13]Status: Disposed25 Sept 2026AY 2012-13
- Dy. CIT-4(1), Indore vs Kiran Bajpai, IndoreITA 426/IND/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed9 Sept 2026AY 2024-25
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Ramesh K Devadiga vs. Khernagar Nandadeep Co Operative Housing Society LTDBombay · 14 Oct 2026
- Ramesh K Devadiga And Ors vs. Khernagar Nandadeep Co-Operative Housing Society LTD And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026
- Permender Singh vs. Union Of INDIA And Ors.Calcutta · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Abdhish Dhal Samanta, Bhubaneswar vs. Chief Commissioner, CT And GST, Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Kniit Net Industries Private Limited, Khurda vs. Superintendent Of CGST And Central Excise, Bhubaneswar Ii CircleOrissa · 14 Oct 2026