BAJAJ EXPORTS PVT. LTD.,NAGPUR vs. THE DY. CIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE, 2(3), NAGPUR
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that it has the power to allow additional grounds of appeal if they relate to the subject matter of the entire tax proceedings, even if they do not directly arise from the impugned order. The issues were therefore remanded to the CIT(A) for adjudication.
What were the facts?
The assessee's appeal pertains to a reassessment order where additions were made on account of disallowance under Section 14A and belated payment of employee's PF contribution. These issues were not adjudicated by the CIT(A) in the original assessment.
What were the issues?
Whether the Tribunal can admit and adjudicate issues not directly arising from the impugned CIT(A) order but related to the overall tax proceedings, and whether disallowances under Section 14A and for belated PF payment are justified.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(1)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- Ahmedabad Electricity Co. Ltd. v. CIT441 citing199 ITR 351 · 1993 · HC
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR
Before: SHRI D. KARUNAKARA RAO, AM & SHRI VIKAS AWASTHY, JM
PER D. KARUNAKARA RAO, AM: This appeal is filed by the assessee against the order of CIT(A)-I, Nagpur dated 15.05.2013 for the Assessment Year 2006-07. 2
The ground nos.1, 5 and 6 are not pressed by the assessee at the time of hearing. Accordingly, they are dismissed as not pressed.
Rest of ground nos.2, 3 and 4 are left for adjudication and the same are extracted hereunder :– “(2) That the learned Assessing Officer erred in law and on facts in disallowing interest expenditure of R
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 14A
- Blacksoil Capital Private Limited (As… vs DCIT, Circle-1(1), HyderabadITA 2217/HYD/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- Hiral Construction, Mumbai vs ITO Ward 42(1)(2), MumbaiITA 8431/MUM/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- The Dy DIT (It) 1(2), Mumbai vs M/S Citi Bank N.A, MumbaiITA 4981/MUM/2007[2002-2003]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2002-2003
- M/S. Citi Bank N.A., Mumbai vs The Addl DIT (It) RG-1, MumbaiITA 4970/MUM/2007[2002-2003]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2002-2003
- M/S American Express Bank Ltd., Mumbai vs The Jt DIT (It)1(1), MumbaiITA 9414/MUM/2004[2000-2001]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2000-2001
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Tvl. Jeyarani Shopping Centre vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer -1/The Deputy Commercial Tax OfficerMadras · 14 Oct 2026
- Rohan Tanna vs. Directorate General Of Goods And Services Tax IntelligenceChhattisgarh · 14 Oct 2026
- Dipak Saikia vs. The Union Of INDIA And 4 OrsGauhati · 14 Oct 2026
- Saraswati Phukan vs. The Union Of INDIA And 4 OrsGauhati · 14 Oct 2026
- Sanjay Maheshwari vs. Union Of INDIA & Ors.Delhi · 14 Oct 2026