ASIAN BUSINESS CONECTION PVT. LTD.,BHOPAL vs. DCIT - 1(1), BHOPAL
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the amount advanced was part of a business transaction and not a dividend, as it was given for strategic investment with an assured return and profit sharing. The Tribunal emphasized that businessmen should not be dictated on how to conduct their affairs, and the transaction was in the ordinary course of business.
What were the facts?
The assessee, Asian Business Connections Private Limited, received a substantial amount from its subsidiary, Advantage Overseas Pvt Ltd, which the Assessing Officer treated as deemed dividend under Section 2(22)(e). The assessee contended it was a strategic commercial transaction based on an MOU for investment and profit sharing.
What were the issues?
Whether advances received by a holding company from its subsidiary for strategic investment, with profit sharing, constitute deemed dividend under Section 2(22)(e) of the Income Tax Act.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(22)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- Taparia Tools Ltd. v. JCIT343 citing55 Taxmann.com 361 · 2015 · SC · Read judgment
- Navnitlal C. Javeri v. K.K. Sen230 citing56 ITR 198 · 1965 · SC
- Smt. Tarulata Shyam v. CIT209 citing108 ITR 345 · 1977 · SC
- Pradip Kumar Malhotra v. CIT152 citing15 Taxmann.com 66 · 2011 · HC
- CIT v. Creative Dyeing & Printing Pvt. Ltd.119 citing184 Taxmann 483 · 2009 · HC · Read judgment
- CIT v. Raj Kumar119 citing181 Taxmann 155 · 2009 · HC · Read judgment
- ACG Associated Capsule Private Limited v. Commissioner of Income Tax, Central IV, Mumbai89 citing3 SCC 321 · 2022
- 82 ITR 363 (SC); Tuticorin Alkali Chemicals & Fertilizers Ltd. v. CIT72 citing93 Taxmann 502 · 1997 · SC
- Miss P. Sarada v. CIT64 citing229 ITR 444 · 1998 · SC
- CIT v. Mukundray K. Shah, Citation No.39 citing160 Taxmann 276 · 2007 · SC
- CIT v. General Insurance Corporation27 citing286 ITR 232 · 2006 · SC · Read judgment
- CIT v. P.K. Badiani25 citing76 ITR 369 · 1970 · HC
- CIT v. P.K. Abubucker (Mad)17 citing259 ITR 507 · 2003 · HC
- Iswar Chand Jindal v. ACIT12 citing61 Taxmann.com 428 · 2015
- 66 (Cal) 11. Bagmane Constructions (P) Ltd. v. Commissioner of Income Tax, Bangalore11 citing57 Taxmann.com 120 · 2015 · HC
- Saamag Developers Pvt Ltd. v. ACIT10 citing90 Taxmann.com 20 · 2018 · HC
- Ravindra R Fotedar v. ACIT8 citing85 Taxmann.com 314 · 2017
- CIT v. Gayatri Chakraborty7 citing94 Taxmann.com 244 · 2018 · HC
- Commissioner of 563, Bhopal Fire & General Insurance Limited v. Commissioner of Income Tax5 citing53 ITR 108 · 1964 · SC
- Farrukhabad Investment (I) Ltd. v. JCIT5 citing85 ITR 230 · 2003 · HC
- 385 (Delhi) 13. Dr. Shiv Kant Mishra v. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle-II, Kanpur3 citing118 ITD 347 · 2009 · ITAT
- 96 Taxman 11 (SC) (vi) Kantilal Manilal v. CIT3 citing135 Taxmann 77 · 2004 · HC
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, INDORE BENCH, INDORE
Before: HONBLE KUL BHARAT & HONBLE MANISH BORAD
The order pronounced in the open Court on 25.09.2019.
More judgments on Section 2(22)(e)
- Sindhu Farms Pvt Ltd, Gurugram vs DCIT, RohtakITA 8194/DEL/2025[2020-21]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2020-21
- Pranav Prakashchandra Kansara, Ahmedabad vs ITO Ward 5 3 2 Ahmedabad, Aayakar Bhavan…ITA 911/AHD/2026[2013-14]Status: Disposed24 Sept 2026AY 2013-14
- Pranav Prakashchandra Kansara, Ahmedabad vs ITO Ward 5 3 2 Ahmedabad, Aayakar Bhavan…ITA 911/AHD/2026[2013-14]Status: Disposed24 Sept 2026AY 2013-14
- M/S. Jsw Infrastructure Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 6051/MUM/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed23 Sept 2026AY 2020-21
- M/S. Jsw Cement Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 4867/MUM/2026[2021-22]Status: Disposed23 Sept 2026AY 2021-22
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Tvl. Jeyarani Shopping Centre vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer -1/The Deputy Commercial Tax OfficerMadras · 14 Oct 2026
- Rohan Tanna vs. Directorate General Of Goods And Services Tax IntelligenceChhattisgarh · 14 Oct 2026
- Dipak Saikia vs. The Union Of INDIA And 4 OrsGauhati · 14 Oct 2026
- Saraswati Phukan vs. The Union Of INDIA And 4 OrsGauhati · 14 Oct 2026
- Sanjay Maheshwari vs. Union Of INDIA & Ors.Delhi · 14 Oct 2026