WANG INVESTMENT & FINANCE PVT. LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT, CIRCLE- 27(1), NEW DELHI

PDF · subscribers
ITA 4663/DEL/2018Status: DisposedITAT Delhi15 February 2022AY 2014-152 pages

In favour of the assessee: the assessee's appeal was allowed. From the AI summary of this appeal.

AI SummaryAllowed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal found that while some disallowance under Section 14A was warranted, the amounts computed by the lower authorities were excessive. The Tribunal determined a reasonable disallowance of Rs. 2,00,000.

What were the facts?

The assessee company, engaged in investment and finance, claimed dividend income as exempt. The Assessing Officer (AO) and CIT(A) made disallowances under Section 14A for expenses related to earning exempt income. The assessee argued no interest expenses were incurred and only DEMAT charges were claimed.

What were the issues?

The primary issue was the correctness of the disallowance made under Section 14A of the Income Tax Act for expenses incurred in relation to earning exempt income.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 14A

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH ‘F’, NEW DELHI

Before: Sh. K. N. CharyDr. B. R. R. Kumar

Hearing: 16.11.2021Pronounced: 15.02.2022

Per Dr. B. R. R. Kumar, Accountant Member:

1.

The present appeal has been filed by the assessee against the order of the ld. CIT(A)-24, New Delhi dated 04.05.2018.

2.

The assessee, M/s Wang Investment & Finance Pvt. Ltd. is in the business of investment & finance. During the year under consideration, the assessee company has shown income mainly from business income and income from capital gains. The assessee filed return of income on 27.09.2014 declaring a total taxable income of Rs.3,66,31,415/-.

3.

During the year, the assessee has earned dividend income of Rs.2,17,34,300/- as exempt income. The assessee has made investments in shares amounting to Rs.39,45,36,274/- with an increase of Rs.1,58,43,283/- as compared to the investments of the last year. The assessee submitted that no interest expenses 2 Wang Investment & Finance Pvt. Ltd. have been incurred which is found to be factually correct. The assessee submitted before the revenue authorities that no expenses were incurred directly or indirectly for earning any income from the said investment as such no disallowance u/s 14A is called for. The assessee submitted that only DEMAT charges were claimed as expenses in relation to earning of exempt income. The AO computed disallowance @0.5% on the investments of Rs.97,03,52,800/-.

4.

The ld. CIT(A) computed the disallowance @0.5% of Rs.38,66,14,600 to Rs.17,56,500 as against the calculation of the AO of Rs.48,51,760/-.

5.

We find that the total expenditure incurred for employee benefit of Rs.12,49,995/- and other expenses were of Rs.14,38,526/- out of which Rs.9,32,020/- have been disallowed suo moto and the balance expense of Rs.17,56,502/- is the sealing of disallowance u/s 14A. Having heard the arguments and after going through the details, we hold that an amount of Rs.2,00,000/- could be reasonably considered as disallowance u/s 14A and ordered accordingly.

6.

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed. Order Pronounced in the Open Court on 15/02/2022.

More judgments on Section 14A

All 15,875 judgments and leading authorities on Section 14A →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →