ACIT, SPECIAL RANGE-6, NEW DELHI vs. NBCC INDIA LTD., NEW DELHI
In favour of the assessee: the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that the tax effect was below the threshold specified by CBDT circulars for filing appeals. The Departmental Representative agreed and did not press the appeal.
What were the facts?
The Revenue filed an appeal against the CIT(A)'s order deleting an addition made under Section 14A. The assessee pointed out that the tax effect was below the revised monetary limit for appeals set by CBDT circulars.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeal is maintainable due to low tax effect as per CBDT circulars. The core issue of disallowance under Section 14A was not adjudicated.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH ‘E’: NEW DELHI
ORDER PER ANADEE NATH MISSHRA, AM: (A) This appeal by Revenue is filed against the order of Learned
Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-37, New Delhi [“Ld. CIT(A)”, for short], dated 21.02.2019 for Assessment Year 2015-16.
Grounds taken in this appeal of Revenue are as under:
“Whether the CIT(A) has erred in deleting the addition on account of disallowance made u/s 14A of the IT Act, 1961 as it is a well settled
ACIT vs. NBCC (India) Ltd. judicial position that if the AO is not satisfied with the correctness of claim of the assessee in relation to exempted income, disallowance shall be computed as per Rule 8D of the Income Tax Rules ?”
(B) At the outset, it was brought to our notice at the time of hearing, by learned Counsel for Assessee, that tax effect in this appeal is below Rs. 50,00,000/-. He further submitted, that vide recent CBDT Circular No.17/2019 dated 08.08.2019 read with earlier CBDT Circular No. 3 of 2018, dated 11.07.2018, minimum threshold limit of tax effect for filing of appeals by Revenue in Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ("ITAT", for short) has been enhanced to Rs.50,00,000/-; and that in a subsequent clarification issued by CBDT vide F. No. 279/Misc/M-93/2018-lTJ, dated 20/08/2019, it has been clarified by CBDT that the aforesaid revised monetary limit is also applicable to all pending appeals in ITAT. In view of the foregoing, it was submitted by Ld. Counsel for Assessee, that this appeal is not maintainable. The Ld. Senior Departmental Representative for Revenue was in agreement with the submissions of Ld. Counsel for the assessee. He did not press the appeal. Therefore, this appeal is dismissed being not pressed; and also being not maintainable having regard to aforesaid CBDT
ACIT vs. NBCC (India) Ltd. Circular No. 17/2019 dated 08.08.2019 read with aforesaid CBDT Circular No. 3 of 2018 in the light of aforesaid clarification dated 20.08.2019.
(C) Before leaving, we clarify that Revenue will be at liberty to approach Income Tax Appellate Tribunal U/s 254(2) of Income Tax Act, 1961; seeking recall of this order and, for restoration of this appeal if it is found that appeal of Revenue is not covered by aforesaid CBDT Circulars dated 08.08.2019 and 11.07.2018.
(D) In the result, this appeal by Revenue is dismissed.
This order was already pronounced orally on 22nd June, 2022 in Open Court, in the presence of representatives of both sides, after conclusion of hearing. Now, this written order in writing is signed today on 23.06.2022.
More judgments on Section 14A
- Blacksoil Capital Private Limited (As… vs DCIT, Circle-1(1), HyderabadITA 2217/HYD/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- Hiral Construction, Mumbai vs ITO Ward 42(1)(2), MumbaiITA 8431/MUM/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- The Dy DIT (It) 1(2), Mumbai vs M/S Citi Bank N.A, MumbaiITA 4981/MUM/2007[2002-2003]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2002-2003
- M/S. Citi Bank N.A., Mumbai vs The Addl DIT (It) RG-1, MumbaiITA 4970/MUM/2007[2002-2003]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2002-2003
- M/S American Express Bank Ltd., Mumbai vs The Jt DIT (It)1(1), MumbaiITA 9414/MUM/2004[2000-2001]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2000-2001
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Ritu Gautam Proprietor Of Ms Heritage International vs. Additional Commissioner Central Goods And Services Tax Appeals Ii Delhi & Anr.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- Sutha vs. The State Tax Officer(Inspection-3)Madras · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S.Sri Satya Sai Constructions vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 27 Oct 2026
- Anisha Busa vs. Sibar Institute Of Dental SciencesAndhra Pradesh · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S.Sri Satya Sai Constructions vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 27 Oct 2026