DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, NEW DELHI vs. MANISH PERIWAL, NEW DELHI
In favour of the assessee: the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the Revenue's appeal was not maintainable as per CBDT Circular No. 17/2019, which enhanced the monetary limit for filing appeals before the Tribunal to Rs. 50 lakhs. The Revenue's counsel did not press the appeal.
What were the facts?
The Revenue filed an appeal before the ITAT against an order of the CIT(Appeals) for AY 2016-17. The tax effect of the disputed addition was Rs.35,02,280/-, which was less than Rs.50 lakhs.
What were the issues?
Whether the Revenue's appeal is maintainable before the ITAT given the tax effect and CBDT circulars regarding monetary limits for appeals.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH “E” NEW DELHI
Before: SHRI ANIL CHATURVEDI & SHRI CHALLA NAGENDRA PRASAD
आदेश /O R D E R PER C.N. PRASAD, J.M.
This appeal by Revenue has been directed against the order of Ld. CIT(Appeals)-23, New Delhi dated 27.02.2020 for AY 2016-17.
The Ld. Counsel for Assessee submits that the Revenue effect in this appeal is less than Rs.50 lakhs. Referring to the grounds of appeal of I.T.A.No.699/Del/2021/A.Y.2016-17 the Revenue it is submitted that the disputed addition is only Rs.35,02,280/- on which the tax effect is less than Rs.50 lakhs.
We have heard Ld. Representatives of both the parties.
Admittedly, the tax effect in the Departmental appeal is less than Rs.50 lakhs. Vide Circular No. 3/18 dated 11.07.2018 issued by CBDT u/s 268A of the I.T. Act, it has been directed that the Department shall not file appeal before the Tribunal in case where the tax effect does not exceed the monetary limit of Rs. 20 lakhs. It is also directed that this Instruction will apply retrospectively to pending appeals and appeals to be filed henceforth in the Tribunal. Pending appeals below this specified tax effect may be withdrawn/not pressed. The aforesaid circular has been amended by issuing further Circular No. 17/2019, whereby the monetary limit for filing Income-tax appeals before the Tribunal has been enhanced to Rs. 50 lakhs. Ld. DR in view of the above Board Circular did not press the Departmental appeal. We also noticed that similar appeals of the Revenue for the assessment years 2008-09 to 2010-11 and 2012-13, 2014- 15 and 2015-16 were also dismissed by the Tribunal by order dated 20.04.2022 in view of the Circular No. 17/2019 dated 08.08.2019. In the result, the Departmental appeal is not maintainable as the appeal is filed against the Board Instruction referred to above and, therefore, the appeal of the Department is liable to be dismissed.
I.T.A.No.699/Del/2021/A.Y.2016-17
In the result, the Departmental appeal is dismissed.
Order pronounced in the open court on 29.08.2022
More judgments on Section 268A
- Income Tax Officer, Ajmer vs Hemant Kumar Sharma, AjmerITA 1506/JPR/2026[2021-22]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Income Tax Officer, Indore vs Aashta Doshi, IndoreITA 789/IND/2025[2024-25]Status: Disposed12 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Income Tax Officer Ward -1(2)(3), Ahmedabad vs Khushal Madhavlal Darji, AhmedabadITA 82/AHD/2026[2022-23]Status: Disposed25 Sept 2026AY 2022-23
- Income Tax Officer, Ward-1, Mehsana vs Hemantkumar Faljibhai Chaudhary, MehsanaITA 475/AHD/2025[2012-13]Status: Disposed25 Sept 2026AY 2012-13
- Dy. CIT-4(1), Indore vs Kiran Bajpai, IndoreITA 426/IND/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed9 Sept 2026AY 2024-25
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- K Madhusudan Reddy vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 28 Oct 2026
- Sandeep Ranjan Rout vs. The Commissioner Of CT And GST, Odisha, KatakOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- Gagan Bihari Rout@Gagan Rout vs. State Of OdishaOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- Biswanath Rana vs. The Commissioner, CT And GST, Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- Sushama Mishra vs. The Commissioner Of CT And GST, Odisha, KatakOrissa · 28 Oct 2026