THE ACIT, KOCHI vs. M/S.TROPICANA LIQUID STORAGE P. LTD, ERNAKULAM
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal dismissed the appeal based on CBDT Circular No. 17/2019, which sets a monetary limit for filing appeals. The issues raised were left open for future proceedings.
What were the facts?
The Revenue filed an appeal before the ITAT for the assessment year 2008-2009. The tax effect in the appeal was less than Rs. 50 lakh.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeal filed by the Revenue is maintainable given the tax effect and the CBDT circular regarding monetary limits for appeals.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, COCHIN BENCH, COCHIN
Before: Shri Chandra Poojari, AM & Shri George George K, JM
This appeal at the instance of the Revenue is directed against the order of the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals)’s dated 14.11.2019. The relevant assessment year is 2008-2009.
At the very outset, it is observed that the tax effect in the appeal filed by the Revenue is less than Rs.50 lakh, and therefore, the Circular No. 17/2019 dated 8th August, 2019, issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) in exercise of its power vested under Sec. 268A of the I.T. Act comes into play, wherein, the monetary limit for filing the appeal(s) by the Revenue before the ITAT and various High Courts as well as 2 M/s.Tropicana Liquid Storage Pvt. Ltd. Apex Court are revised with an object of reducing the tax litigation. Vide para 2 of the said circular (supra), it is stated that in cases where the tax effect in the appeal to be filed before the Appellate Tribunal does not exceed Rs. 50 lakh, appeal should not be filed. Thus, taking a note of CBDT Circular No. 17/2019 dated 8th August, 2019 and considering the fact that the tax effect in the instant appeal is less than Rs.50 lakh, the present appeal deserves to be dismissed, as not maintainable. However, we make it clear that the issue(s) raised in the instant appeal is left open to be examined in the appropriate proceedings, if arises, in future. At the same time, we also make it clear that if the appeal falls in any of the exceptions referred to in the above said CBDT Circular, the Revenue is at liberty to move an application for recalling the order, if so, advised.
Accordingly in the light of CBDT Circular No.17/2019 dated 08th August, 2019, the appeal stands dismissed.
In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed.
Order pronounced on this 05th day of March, 2020.
Sd/- Sd/- (Chandra Poojari) (George George K) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER Cochin ; Dated : 05th March, 2020. Devadas G*
3 M/s.Tropicana Liquid Storage Pvt. Ltd.
More judgments on Section 268A
- Income Tax Officer, Ajmer vs Hemant Kumar Sharma, AjmerITA 1506/JPR/2026[2021-22]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Income Tax Officer, Indore vs Aashta Doshi, IndoreITA 789/IND/2025[2024-25]Status: Disposed12 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Income Tax Officer Ward -1(2)(3), Ahmedabad vs Khushal Madhavlal Darji, AhmedabadITA 82/AHD/2026[2022-23]Status: Disposed25 Sept 2026AY 2022-23
- Income Tax Officer, Ward-1, Mehsana vs Hemantkumar Faljibhai Chaudhary, MehsanaITA 475/AHD/2025[2012-13]Status: Disposed25 Sept 2026AY 2012-13
- Dy. CIT-4(1), Indore vs Kiran Bajpai, IndoreITA 426/IND/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed9 Sept 2026AY 2024-25
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Prabhudatta Mishra vs. The Commissioner Of Commercial Taxes And Goods And Services Tax, OdishaOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Rajesh Kumar Gupta vs. Joint Commissioner Of GST (Appeal), Territorial Range, BolangirOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S. Attitude Exim PVT. LTD., Rourkela vs. The Commissioner Of CT And GST, CuttackOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S.Pradeep Kumar Mahapatra, Bhubaneswar vs. Superintendent Bhubaneswar-Iii Circle, CGST Range, BhubaneswarOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Dillip Kumar Behera vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, Mayurbhanj CircleOrissa · 15 Oct 2026