DILSHAD HUSAIN,ALLAHABAD vs. ACIT CIRCLE-1, ALLAHABAD
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal restored the matters to the AO for fresh examination. The assessee is directed to produce bank accounts and explain deposits related to his truck business under Section 44AE. For transport commission, the existence of business needs to be established.
What were the facts?
The assessee's appeals against assessment and penalty orders were dismissed by the CIT(A) for non-compliance and lack of evidence. The assessee had deposited a significant amount in his bank account, which the AO treated as income, and also claimed transport commission.
What were the issues?
Whether the assessee provided sufficient evidence for his income from truck freight and transport commission, and whether the AO and CIT(A) correctly assessed the income in the absence of proper documentation.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 144,Section 143(3),Section 271(1)(c),Section 44AE,Section 44AB,Section 44AA,Section 271B
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ALLAHABAD BENCH, ALLAHABAD
Before: SH. SUDHANSHU SRIVASTAVA & SH. NIKHIL CHOUDHARY
PER SH. NIKHIL CHOUDHARY, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER:
These appeals have been filed against the orders of the ld. CIT(A), NFAC under section 250 r.w.s. 254 of the Income Tax Act on 22.09.2022, wherein the ld. CIT(A), upon restoration of the appeals against assessments orders under section 144 for the A.Y. 2009-10, 143(3) for the A.Y. 2011-12 and the penalty order under section 271(1)(c) for the A.Y. 2009-10, has dismissed the appeals filed by the assessee.
Aggrieved with the dismissal of the said appeals, the assessee has come before us in appeal yet again. The grounds of appeal preferred by the assessee are as under:- A.Ys. 2009-10 & 2011-12 Dilshad Husain
A.Y. 2009-10; ITA
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 271(1)(c)
- Ajaybhai Dineshbhai Bagdai, Near Central… vs The Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(2)(1), New…ITA 74/RJT/2026[2013-14]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2013-14
- Shalin Jayantbhai Desai, Vadodara vs ACIT, Circle-4(2), Vadodara Present…ITA 2569/AHD/2026[2010-11]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2010-11
- Neo Structo Construction P. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The Pr. CIT- 3, AhmedabadITA 1216/AHD/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- Hetal Vinodchandra Sheth, Ahmedabad vs The ITO, Ward-5(3)(1), AhmedabadITA 2370/AHD/2025[2014-15]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Hetal Vinodchandra Sheth, Ahmedabad vs The ITO, Ward-5(3)(1), AhmedabadITA 2369/AHD/2025[2014-15]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Sanjay Maheshwari vs. Union Of INDIA & Ors.Delhi · 14 Oct 2026
- Iyyanan Eswaran vs. The Appellate Deputy Commissioner (St) (GST)Madras · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Dc Security Services vs. Commissioner Of Central Goods And Services TaxUttarakhand · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Shreekanth Enterprises vs. Joint Commissioner AppealsUttarakhand · 14 Oct 2026
- Sharad Ashok Agarwal vs. State Of Maharashtra Through G.P. And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026