SHRIMANT JAYSINGRAO GHATGE NAGARI SAHAKARI PAT SANSTHA LTD,KOLHAPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1(5), KOLHAPUR, KOLHAPUR
In favour of the assessee: the assessee's appeal was allowed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the amended provisions of Section 143(1)(a)(v) requiring filing by the due date under Section 139(1) for deduction are not applicable to the assessment year 2018-19. Therefore, the disallowance of deduction under Section 80P was incorrect.
What were the facts?
The assessee, a cooperative credit society, claimed deduction under Section 80P. The return of income was filed after the due date under Section 139(1) but before the due date for belated returns under Section 139(4). The deduction was disallowed on the grounds of late filing.
What were the issues?
Whether the disallowance of deduction under Section 80P is justified when the return was filed belatedly under Section 139(4) and the amended provisions of Section 143(1)(a)(v) are not applicable.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 80P,Section 139(1),Section 139(4),Section 143(1),Section 80AC
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, SMC BENCH, PUNE
Before: SHRI R.S. SYAL
आदेश / ORDER
PER R.S. SYAL, VP:
This appeal by the assessee arises out of the order dated 28-02-2023 passed by the CIT(A) in National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi u/s.250 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter also called ‘the Act’) in relation to the assessment year 2018-19.
The only issue raised in this appeal is against the denial of deduction u/s.80P of the Act.
Briefly stated, the facts of the case, are that the assessee is a cooperative credit society engaged in providing credit facilities to its members. The return of income was filed u/s.139(4) of the Act. Such Shrimant Jaysingrao Ghatge Nagari Sahakari Patsanstha Ltd., return was processed u/s.143(1) and the amount of deduction claimed by the assessee u/s.80P was disallowed on the ground that the return was not filed as per the due date u/s.139(1) of the Act. The ld. CIT(A) did not accept the assessee’s contention and held section 80AC to be applicable as per which deduction can be allowed only on the filing of return u/s.139(1). Aggrieved thereby, the assessee has come up in appeal before the Tribunal.
I have heard both the sides and gone through the relevant material on record. The assessee’s return filed u/s 139(4) of the Act was processed u/s.143(1). Here, it is relevant to mention that the Finance Act, 2021 carried out amendment to section 143(1)(a)(v) w.e.f. 01-04-2021 stipulating the deduction to be allowed only if the return was filed by the due date specified u/s.139(1) of the Act. Prior to this, there was no such requirement of filing the return u/s.139(1) so as to escape from the rigour of section 143(1)(a)(v) of the Act. The assessment year under consideration is 2018-19 and hence, the amended provision is not applicable. I, therefore, hold that though the assessee contravened section 80AC but because of the processing of the return u/s.143(1), cannot be saddled with the disallowance of Shrimant Jaysingrao Ghatge Nagari Sahakari Patsanstha Ltd., deduction u/s.80P on the ground of filing of the return u/s.139(1) of the Act. Similar view has been taken by the Pune Benches of the Tribunal in Finolex Industries Ltd. Employees Co-op Credit Society Ltd. Vs. ITO (ITA No.76/PUN/2023), a copy of such order dated 03-04-2023 has been placed on record. Respectfully following the precedent, I overturn the impugned order on this issue and direct to grant the deduction u/s.80P as claimed by the assessee in the processing of the return u/s 143(1) of the Act.
In the result, the appeal is allowed. Order pronounced in the Open Court on 19th May, 2023.
More judgments on Section 80P
- Shree Bandharda Seva Sahkari Mandli Ltd… vs Income Tax Officer Ward -4, JunagadhITA 881/RJT/2025[2019-20]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Duddukuru Primary Agricultural Cooperative… vs ITO, Ward - 1, TadepalligudemITA 258/VIZ/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Parthasaradhi Mutually Aided Co-Operative… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward-17(1), HyderabadITA 2322/HYD/2026[AY 2016-17]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026
- Jijamata Mahila Gramin Bigar Sheti Sahakari… vs ITO Ward -1, BhandraITA 102/NAG/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed12 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Shri Na vs Ari Khedut Sahkari Society Ltd…ITA 362/SRT/2025[2016-17]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2016-17
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S N D Waddar And Co vs. Sri Gaurav GuptaKarnataka · 30 Oct 2026
- Kanwar Enterprises Private Limited vs. The Joint Commissioner - State TaxTelangana · 30 Oct 2026
- M/S. Bangi Mines And Minerals vs. The State Of TelanganaTelangana · 30 Oct 2026
- M/S. Arka Business Solutions vs. Principal Commissioner Of CustomsTelangana · 30 Oct 2026
- M/S. Mehra Mac Industries Private Limited vs. The Deputy State Tax OfficerTelangana · 30 Oct 2026