ADDL. CIT, SPECIAL RANGE- 6, NEW DELHI vs. NEC TECHNOLOGIES INDIA PVT. LTD., NEW DELHI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal decided that the DRP was justified in excluding two comparables, M/s E-Infochips Bangalore Limited and M/s Infinite Data Systems Pvt. Limited, as they were functionally dissimilar to the assessee. The Tribunal also upheld the deletion of the addition made under Section 40(a)(i).
What were the facts?
The Revenue appealed against an order of the Dispute Resolution Panel (DRP) which deleted an addition made under Section 40(a)(i) and excluded certain comparables. The assessee had filed objections before the DRP against the draft assessment order.
What were the issues?
Whether the DRP was justified in deleting the addition under Section 40(a)(i) and excluding specific comparables used by the TPO for transfer pricing assessment.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(9)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- Manindra Land and Building Corpn. Ltd. v. Bhutnath Banerjee (AIR 1964 SC 1336 Mata Din v. A. Narayanan116 citing3 SCC 545 · 1985
- STATE OF U.P v. VAM ORGANIC CHEMICALS LTD.,2084 citing1 SCC 225 · 2004
- Pundlik Jalam Patil v. Executive Engineer, Jalgaon Medium Project82 citing17 SCC 448 · 2008 · SC
- Basawaraj v. Land Acquisition Officer65 citing14 SCC 81 · 2013 · SC
- Ram Nath Sahu & Others v. Gobardhan Sao and Others43 citing3 SCC 195 · 2002
- Postmaster General v. Living Media India Limited26 citing3 SCC 563 · 2012
- Popat and Kotecha Property v. SBI Staff Assn.8 citing7 SCC 510 · 2005
- Medium Project, (2008) 17 SCC 448: (2009) 5 SCC (Civ) 9071) 14. In P. Ramachandra Rao v. State of Karnataka6 citing4 SCC 578 · 1981
- Maniben Devraj Shah v. Municipal Corpn. of Brihan Mumbai5 citing5 SCC 157 · 2012
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH: ‘H’: NEW DELHI
Before: SHRI RAMIT KOCHAR & SHRI SUDHIR PAREEK
PER SUDHIR PAREEK, JM
By way of this appeal, the Revenue assails the order dated 23.12.2014, passed by the Learned Dispute Resolution Panel- 2(DRP) u/s 144C(5) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred as "the Act") for A.Y. 2010-11. ITA No.- 7392/Del/2017 M/s NEC Technologies India Pvt. Ltd.
The appellant/Revenue has raised following grounds of appeal for adjudication: -
Whether on facts and in circumstances of the case, the Ld. Dispute Resolutions Panel-II is legally justified in deleting the addition made under section 40(a)(i) amounting to Rs. 9,34,91,383/- by igno
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 40(a)(i)
- M/S American Express Bank Ltd., Mumbai vs The Jt DIT (It)1(1), MumbaiITA 9414/MUM/2004[2000-2001]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2000-2001
- DDIT(It)- 1(1), Mumbai vs M/S. American Express Bank Ltd., MumbaiITA 5667/MUM/2004[2000-01]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2000-01
- Eurofins Peenya Resources Private Limited… vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 1116/BANG/2023[2016-17]Status: Disposed28 Sept 2026AY 2016-17
- Azure Green Tech Private Limited, Delhi vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle…ITA 6199/DEL/2026[2021-22]Status: Disposed21 Sept 2026AY 2021-22
- Azure Green Tech Private Limited, Delhi vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle…ITA 6198/DEL/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed21 Sept 2026AY 2020-21
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Hindustan Coca-Cola Beverages PVT. LTD. vs. The Commissioner, CGST And Cx, Dibrugarh And AnrGauhati · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Shree Sushruta Health Services Private Limited vs. The Union Of INDIAPatna · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Rst Batteries vs. Deputy Commissioner CGST Delhi West & Ors.Delhi · 14 Oct 2026
- Dr.Sunil Kumar Padhi vs. The Chief Commissioner, GST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- N.K Fashion Through It Proprietor Mr. Narender Agarwal vs. Assistant Commissioner Of Central Goods And Service Tax, Delhi EastDelhi · 14 Oct 2026