ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CIRCLE - 2, AURANGABAD vs. M/S. SANJEEV AUTO PARTS MANUFACTURERS PRIVATE LIMITED, AURANGABAD

PDF · subscribers
ITA 1622/PUN/2017Status: DisposedITAT Pune04 November 2020AY 2014-152 pages

In favour of the assessee: the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.

AI SummaryDismissed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal noted that as per CBDT Circular No. 17/2019, appeals with a tax effect below Rs. 50 lakhs should not be filed. Therefore, the appeal was dismissed.

What were the facts?

The Revenue filed an appeal before the ITAT against an order of the CIT(A) for AY 2014-15. The tax effect in the appeal was less than Rs. 50 lakhs.

What were the issues?

Whether the Revenue's appeal is maintainable before the ITAT given the tax effect is below the threshold stipulated by CBDT circulars.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 268A

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “A” BENCH, PUNE

Before: SHRI INTURI RAMA RAO, AM & SHRI S. S. VISWANETHRA RAVI, JM

Hearing: 05.11.2020Pronounced: 05.11.2020

PER INTURI RAMA RAO, AM: This is an appeal filed by the Revenue directed against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-2, Aurangabad (‘CIT(A)’ for short) dated 24.04.2017 for the Assessment Year 2014-15. 2. It is stated before us that the tax effect in the present appeal is less than Rs.50 lakhs and therefore, the Circular No.17/2019 dated 08.08.2019 issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) in exercise of its power vested under Sec.268A(1) of the IT Act comes into play wherein, the monetary limit for filing the appeal by the Revenue before the ITAT and various High Courts as well as Apex Court are revised with an object of reducing the tax litigation. Vide para 3 of the said circular (supra) it is stated that in cases

2 where the tax effect in the appeals to be filed before the Appellate Tribunal does not exceed Rs.50 lakhs appeals should not be filed. Thus, taking a note of CBDT Circular No.17/2019, dated 08.08.2019 and considering the fact that the tax effect in the instant appeal is less than Rs.50 lakhs, the present appeal deserves to be dismissed as not pressed / not maintainable. However, we make it clear that the issues raised in the instant appeal are left open to be examined in the appropriate proceedings, if arises, in future. At the same time, we also make it clear that if the appeal falls in any of the exceptions referred to in the above said CBDT Circular, the Revenue is at liberty to move an application for recalling the order if so advised. Accordingly, in the light of CBDT Circular No.17/2019 dated 08/08/2019, the appeal filed by the Revenue stands dismissed.

3.

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue stands dismissed. Order pronounced on this 05th day of November, 2020. (S. S. VISWANETHRA RAVI) (INTURI RAMA RAO) "याियक सद"य/JUDICIAL MEMBER लेखा सद"य/ACCOUNTANT MEMBER पुणे / Pune; "दनांक / Dated : 05th November, 2020. Sujeet आदेश क" "ितिलिप अ"ेिषत / Copy of the Order forwarded to : अपीलाथ" / The Appellant.

1.

""यथ" / The Respondent.

2.3.

The CIT(A)-2, Aurangabad.

4.

The Pr. CIT-2, Aurangabad. िवभागीय "ितिनिध, आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण, “ए” ब"च, 5. पुणे / DR, ITAT, “A” Bench, Pune. गाड" फ़ाइल / Guard File. 6. आदेशानुसार / BY ORDER, //// Senior Private Secretary आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण, पुणे / ITAT, Pune.

More judgments on Section 268A

All 3,931 judgments and leading authorities on Section 268A →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →