KRISHAK SEVA SAHKARI SAMITI LIMITED MITLI,MITLI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, BARAUT, BARAUT
In favour of the assessee: the assessee's appeal was allowed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the disallowance made by invoking Section 143(1)(a)(v) was not sustainable as this section was introduced prospectively and not applicable to the assessment years in question. Therefore, the orders passed by the lower authorities were quashed.
What were the facts?
The assessee's appeals were against orders that disallowed a deduction under Section 80P, citing Section 143(1)(a)(v) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The assessee argued that Section 143(1)(a)(v) was introduced by the Finance Act, 2021, effective from April 1, 2021, and thus not applicable to the assessment years 2019-20 and 2020-21.
What were the issues?
Whether Section 143(1)(a)(v) of the Income Tax Act, introduced by the Finance Act, 2021, can be applied retrospectively to disallow deductions for Assessment Years prior to its enactment.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “C” BENCH, DELHI
Before: MS. MADHUMITA ROY & SHRI AVDHESH KUMAR MISHRA
Both the appeals filed by the assessee are directed against the order dated 12.06.2024 & 13.06.2024 passed by the Ld. Addl/JCIT(A)-3 Bengaluru, arising out of the common Intimation Order dated 11.01.2022 passed by the ADIT, CPC, Bengaluru under Section 154 r.w.s 143(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') for Assessment Years 2019-20 & 2020-21.
& 5138/Del/2024 Krishak Seva Sahkari Samiti Limited (AYs: 2019-20 & 2020-21) for Assessment Year: 2019-20:
The matter relates to disallowance of claim under Section 80P(2)(a)(i) to the tune of Rs.8,22,193/- made by CPC in turn confirmed by the First Appellate Authority invoking the provision of Section 143(1)(a)(v) of the Act.
At the time of hearing of the instant appeal the Ld. Counsel appearing for the assessee submitted before us that this particular provision of law envisaged in Section 143(1)(a)(v) has been introduced by the Finance Act, 2021 w.e.f 01.04.2021 for Assessment Year 2021-22 onwards and not for Assessment Year 2019-20 as before us. In that view of the matter the disallowance of deduction claimed by the assessee under Section 80P of the Act has not sustainable in the eyes of law. In support of argument he has further relied upon the judgment passed by the Co-ordinate Bench in the case of The Defence Accounts Co-operative Credit Society Ltd. Vs. ITO in for Assessment Year 2019-20 a copy whereof has also been annexed to the paper book filed before us. In fact, considering the identical facts of the matter the Coordinate Bench has been pleased to quash the order passed by the authorities below.
On the contrary, the Ld. DR relied upon the order passed by the authorities below.
We have heard the rival submissions made by the respective parties and we have also perused the relevant materials available on record including the order passed by the Coordinate Bench in the identical facts & 5138/Del/2024 Krishak Seva Sahkari Samiti Limited (AYs: 2019-20 & 2020-21) and circumstances of the matter. In fact, under Section 80P deduction claimed to the tune of Rs.20,15,988/- was disallowed considering the provision of Section 143(1)(a)(v) of the Act. Having regard to the admitted position that this particular section has been introduced by the Finance Act, 2021 and w.e.f 1.04.2021 having no retrospective effect the Coordinate Bench has been pleased to quash the order passed by the authorities below.
Thus, having heard the Ld. Counsels appearing for the parties and having regard to the facts and circumstances of the matter and the order passed by the Coordinate Bench and the provision of law which has been introduced by the Finance Act, 2021 with effect from 01.04.2021 we are of the considered opinion that the impugned addition invoking Section 143(a)(v)(i) of the Act is not sustainable in the eyes of law and therefore, the order impugned is quashed. The appeal of the assessee is allowed.
Having regard to the identical facts of the matter in Assessment Year 2020-21 this observation made by us in allowing the appeal preferred by the assessee as aforesaid is applied mutatis mutandis. This appeal preferred by the assessee is also allowed.
Both the appeals preferred by the assessee are allowed.
Order pronounced in the open court on 08.07.2025
More judgments on Section 80P
- Shree Bandharda Seva Sahkari Mandli Ltd… vs Income Tax Officer Ward -4, JunagadhITA 881/RJT/2025[2019-20]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Duddukuru Primary Agricultural Cooperative… vs ITO, Ward - 1, TadepalligudemITA 258/VIZ/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Parthasaradhi Mutually Aided Co-Operative… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward-17(1), HyderabadITA 2322/HYD/2026[AY 2016-17]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026
- Jijamata Mahila Gramin Bigar Sheti Sahakari… vs ITO Ward -1, BhandraITA 102/NAG/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed12 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Shri Na vs Ari Khedut Sahkari Society Ltd…ITA 362/SRT/2025[2016-17]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2016-17
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S. Mehra Mac Industries Private Limited vs. The Deputy State Tax OfficerTelangana · 30 Oct 2026
- Santosh Das And Anr. vs. Union Of INDIACalcutta · 30 Oct 2026
- M/S Rama Krishna Industries vs. State Of Hp And OthersHimachal Pradesh · 30 Oct 2026
- Smt Usha W/O Shri Tarun vs. Union Of INDIARajasthan · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S Maruti Nandan Minetech Private Limited vs. The Joint CommissionerRajasthan · 29 Oct 2026