UDYAN LARGE SIZE MULTIPURPOSE CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD.,BALAPUR, DAKSHIN DINAJPUR vs. I.T.O., WARD - 3(4), BALURGHAT PRESENTLY AT I.T.O., VERIFICATION UNIT, MALDA, DAKSHIN DINAJPUR
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the miscellaneous income, primarily grants received from the West Bengal Government for the society's objects, should not be treated as income from other sources. It is eligible for deduction under Section 80P.
What were the facts?
The assessee, a cooperative society, claimed deduction under Section 80P. The Assessing Officer treated miscellaneous income of Rs. 9,92,664/- as income from other sources, which was upheld by the CIT(Appeals). The assessee appealed to the ITAT.
What were the issues?
Whether miscellaneous income, including government grants, received by a cooperative society for its stated objects should be treated as income from other sources or eligible for deduction under Section 80P.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘SMC’ BENCH, KOLKATA
Before: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice- & Dr. Manish Borad
order : May 09, 2023 O R D E R Per Dr. Manish Borad, Accountant Member:- This appeal at the instance of assessee for assessment year 2017-18 is directed against the order of 1 A.Y. 2017-2018 Udyan Large Size Multipurpose Cooperative Society Limited ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi dated 10.11.2022, which is arising out of the order under section 143(3) of the Act dated 19.12.2019 framed by Assessing Officer.
So far as Grounds No. 1 & 5 are concerned, they relate to the addition made by the ld. Assessing Officer for unexplained money under section 69A of the Act for the alleged cash deposits during demonetisation period by invoking the provisions of section 115BBE of the Act.
We, however, from the perusal of the impugned order, notice that the said addition has already been deleted by the ld. CIT(Appeals) in para 5.7.6 of the impugned order holding that there is no merit in the addition made of Rs.17,60,000/- and the same is hereby deleted. Since the addition of Rs.17,60,000/- made under section 69A of the Act has already been deleted by the ld. CIT(Appeals), wherein the ld. Assessing Officer has wrongly invoked the provisions of section 115BB of the Act, therefore, Grounds No. 1 & 5 become infructuous as already decided in favour of the assessee by the ld. CIT(Appeals).
Now remaining Ground No. 2 before us is only with regard to the addition of Rs.9,92,664/-. Facts in brief relating to this are that the assessee, which is a Cooperative Society, formed by its Tribal members and registered under the West Bengal A.Y. 2017-2018 Udyan Large Size Multipurpose Cooperative Society Limited Cooperative Societies Act, 1973 having Registration No. 69-WD of 1976, is engaged in providing Mini Bank service to its members, Sales of Fertilizer to its Tribal members as per bye-laws, guidelines of Government of West Bengal. In the return of income filed on 26.03.2018 for A.Y. 2017-18, deduction under section 80P has been claimed at Rs.65,844/-. During the course of complete scrutiny under CASS, ld. Assessing Officer noticed that in the Profit & Loss Account, the assessee has claimed miscellaneous income of Rs.9,92,664.28. The ld. Assessing Officer confronted the assessee to explain the nature of the said miscellaneous income, but could not get satisfactory reply, as a result of which, the ld. Assessing Officer treated it as income from other sources. The assessee carried the matter in appeal before the ld. CIT(Appeals), but it again failed to get any relief. Now the assessee is in appeal before the Tribunal.
Ld. Counsel for the assessee placed the break-up of miscellaneous income stating that all these income are part of regular activities of the Cooperative Society for which it is established for.
On the other hand, ld. D.R. supported the order of both the lower authorities.
We have heard the rival contentions and perused the relevant record placed before us. The miscellaneous income of A.Y. 2017-2018 Udyan Large Size Multipurpose Cooperative Society Limited Rs.9,92,664/- shown in the Profit & Loss Account has been treated by both the lower authorities as income from other sources. The break-up of the miscellaneous income of Rs.9,92,664/- as provided by the assessee during the course of hearing is reproduced below:-
Before us, it has been contended by the ld. Counsel for the assessee that all the above-referred heads of miscellaneous income are part and parcel of the regular activities carried out by the assessee-Society for its Tribal members and cannot be held to be the income from other sources. We have given thoughtful consideration and also gone through the audited financial statement provided by the assessee in the paper book running from pages 42 to 69. We notice that the assessee is working only for the Tribal members and the main purpose of the Society to provide Mini Bank service to its members, Sales of Fertilizer to its Tribal members etc. It is also discernable that various grants are received from the West Bengal State Government. Perusal of page 38 of the paper book also shows that the West Bengal Tribal A.Y. 2017-2018 Udyan Large Size Multipurpose Cooperative Society Limited Development Cooperative Corporation Limited, which is a Government of West Bengal Undertaking, is an Apex Body over the various types of Societies like that of assessee. Further we find that the miscellaneous income of Rs.9,92,664/- mainly constitutes grant received from the West Bengal Government for various activities as per its registered bye-laws. We do not find any reason to treat any of the element of miscellaneous income enumerated above as income from other sources. Since the alleged sum of Rs.9,92,664/- is the income earned by the Society for the purpose of its objects, the same is eligible for deduction under section 80P of the Act. We thus reverse the finding of ld. CIT(Appeals) and allow Grounds No. 2, 3 & 4 of the assessee directing the ld. Assessing Officer not to treat Rs.9,92,664/- as income from other sources and the same should be considered as income earned by the Society eligible for deduction under section 80P of the Act. Thus Grounds No. 2, 3 & 4 are allowed.
Ground No. 6 is general in nature, which does not call for recording of any reason.
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed. Order pronounced in the open Court on May 9th, 2023.
More judgments on Section 69A
- Vishal Kumar Patel(HUF), Raipur vs DCIT, Circle-1(1), RaipurITA 595/RPR/2026[2017-18]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- Adj Agri International LLP, Rajkot vs The Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(1)(1), RajkotITA 1198/RJT/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Ashok Singh, Jaipur vs ACIT, Circle-2 Jaipur, JaipurITA 1540/JPR/2025[2015-16]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Hemal Paresh Madeka, Rajkot vs Asst.Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 955/RJT/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Neepaben Sunnybhai Motwani, Rajkot vs Income Tax Officer, RajkotITA 875/RJT/2026[2021-22]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Kamlasana Impex Private Limited vs. Director General Of GST Intelligence (Hq) Delhi) & Anr.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- Ritu Gautam Proprietor Of Ms Heritage International vs. Additional Commissioner Central Goods And Services Tax Appeals Ii Delhi & Anr.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- Sutha vs. The State Tax Officer(Inspection-3)Madras · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S.Sri Satya Sai Constructions vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 27 Oct 2026
- Anisha Busa vs. Sibar Institute Of Dental SciencesAndhra Pradesh · 27 Oct 2026