M/S. RIBBON COMMUNICATION PRIVATE LIMITED (FORMERLY KNOWN AS SONUS NETWORKS INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED ),BANGALORE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-6(1)(2), BANGALORE
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The assessee requested to withdraw the appeal as the grounds raised before the Tribunal were consequential to the MAP resolution. The Tribunal allowed the withdrawal.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal before the ITAT against an assessment order. The principal transfer pricing issues had been resolved through Mutual Agreement Proceedings (MAP).
What were the issues?
Whether the appeal filed before the ITAT is maintainable when the core transfer pricing issues have been resolved through MAP.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “A” BENCH : BANGALORE
Before: SHRI GEORGE GEORGE K & SHRI LAXMI PRASAD SAHU
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “A” BENCH : BANGALORE BEFORE SHRI GEORGE GEORGE K, VICE PRESIDENT AND SHRI LAXMI PRASAD SAHU, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER IT(TP)A No.2971/Bang/2018 Assessment Year : 2014-15 M/s. Ribbon Communication Pvt. Ltd., Vs. DCIT, (formerly known as Sonus Networks India Circle – 6(1)(2), Private Limited), Bengaluru. Swarna Latha P V, 2nd Floor, Delta Block, Embassy Tech Square, Kadubeesenahalli Village, Outer Ring Road, Varthur Hobli, Bengaluru – 560 103. PAN : AALCS 5706 R APPELLANT RESPONDENT Assessee by : Smt. Rashmi R, Advocate Revenue by : Shri. D. K. Mishra, CIT(DR)(ITAT), Bengaluru Date of hearing : 23.08.2023 Date of Pronouncement : 23.08.2023 O R D E R Per George George K, Vice President :
This appeal at the instance of assessee is directed against the Assessment Order of DCIT (order dated 31.08.2023), passed under section 143(3) r.w.s. 144C(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter called ‘the Act’). The relevant Assessment Year is 2014-15.
When this appeal came up for hearing, the learned Counsel for assessee Smt. Rashmi R, Advocate, submitted that the principal grounds pertaining to transfer pricing are resolved under the Mutual Agreement Proceedings (MAP) and the grounds raised before the Tribunal are consequential in nature, and IT(TP)A No.2971/Bang/2018 Page 2 of 2 hence the assessee wants to withdraw the appeal filed before the Tribunal. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
In the result, appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.
Pronounced in the open court on the date mentioned on the caption page.
More judgments on Section 144C(3)
- Radhakishan Potharajula, Karim Nagar vs ITO (Int Taxn)-2, HyderabadITA 2340/HYD/2025[2016-17]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2016-17
- Neha Hiranand Motwani, Nashik vs ITO International Tax, NashikITA 1570/PUN/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed5 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- ACIT-Circle 6(1)(1) Mumbai, Mumbai vs Aditya Birla Real Estate Limited, MumbaiITA 7767/MUM/2026[2013-14]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2013-14
- ACIT-Circle6(1)(1) Mumbai., Mumbai vs Aditya Birla Real Estate Limited, MumbaiITA 7766/MUM/2026[2016-17]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2016-17
- Atc Tires Private Limited, Mumbai vs The Principal Commissioner of Income-Tax…ITA 6468/MUM/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed23 Sept 2026AY 2020-21
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S. Rohit Medical Systems vs. Commissioner Of Delhi Goods And Services Tax And Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Manoj Kumar Prop M K Steel Traders vs. Additional Commissioner, Central Goods And Services Tax & Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Shivam Kumar vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Rajkalpana Travels PVT. LTD. vs. Commissioner CGST, Delhi North CommissionerateDelhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Mahaveer Ispat Traders vs. Principal Commissioner Dgst Delhi Department Of Trade And Taxes Gnctd & Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026