PURVI SEWA SAMITI,FARIDABAD vs. CIT EXMPTION , FARIDABAD

PDF · subscribers
ITA 1834/DEL/2025Status: DisposedITAT Delhi08 August 2025Bench: MS. MADHUMITA ROY (Judicial Member), SHRI NAVEEN CHANDRA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER (Assessment Year: 2023) | Purvi Sewa Samiti | House No. 1377, Near | Kabuli Gurudwara, | Gali No. 10, S.G.M. | Nagar, NIT, | Haryana - 121001 | स्थायीलेखासं . / जीआइआरसं . / PAN/GIR No: AACAP5307N | Appellant | Vs. | CIT, Exemption | CGO Complex, | NH-4, NIT | Haryana - 121001 | Respondent | Appellant by : | Sh. Umesh Sinha, CA | Respondent by : | Sh. Manish Gupta, Sr. DR | Date of Hearing | 06.08.2025 | Date of Pro5 pages
AI SummaryPartly Allowed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal allowed the appeals for statistical purposes, setting aside the issue to the CIT(E) for fresh adjudication. This was to provide the assessee a further opportunity to represent their case effectively after considering all evidence.

What were the facts?

The assessee's appeals were directed against orders of the CIT(E) rejecting their application for approval under Section 10(23C)(iv)(B) and consequently under Section 80G. The rejections were due to the absence of requisite submissions by the applicant.

What were the issues?

Whether the assessee should be granted a further opportunity to present their case before the CIT(E) for approval under Section 10(23C)(iv)(B) and Section 80G after the initial rejection due to non-submission of requisite documents.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 10(23C),Section 80G

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “G” BENCH, DELHI

Before: MS. MADHUMITA ROY & SHRI NAVEEN CHANDRA

Hearing: 06.08.2025Pronounced: 08.08.2025
1.

Both the appeals filed by the assessee are directed against the orders both dated 05.12.2024 passed by the CIT(E), Chandigarh whereby and whereunder in the absence of requisite submissions made by the applicant in support of the application in Form No. 10AB under Section 10(23C) (iv)(B) of the Act has been rejected. Further that, consequently the approval under Section 80G also stood rejected.

& 1834/Del/2025 Purvi Sewa Samiti (AY: 2023)

2.

At the time of haring of the instant appeals the Ld. Counsel appearing for the assessee candidly submitted before us that the assessee due to some personal reason could not pursue the application effectively before the Ld. CIT(E) and therefore, prayed for further opportunity to place the claim of approval as per application for approval under Section 10(23C) (iv)(B) of the Act effectively before the Ld. CIT(E) and also the claim for approval under Section 80G of the Act. Such submissions made by the Ld. AR has not been controverted by the Ld. DR with all his fairness.

3.

Under this facts and circumstances of the matter having regard to the issues involved in this particular case in order to prevent the miscarriage of justice, we would like grant a further opportunity to the assessee to represent its case effectively before the Ld. CIT(E). Thus, these two appeals are disposed of by setting aside the issues to the file of the Ld. CIT(E) for fresh adjudication of the same upon granting an opportunity of being heard to the assessee and upon considering the evidences on record or any other evidence which the assessee may choose to file at the time of hearing of the matter.

4.

Appeals preferred by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes.

Order pronounced in the open court on 08.08.2025

More judgments on Section 10(23C)

All 713 judgments and leading authorities on Section 10(23C) →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →