CANARA BANK,JALANDHAR vs. DCIT (TDS), LUDHIANA
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal allowed the assessee's application to withdraw the appeal. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn, with the Revenue not opposing the application.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against an assessment order for the block period 1988-89 to 1998-99. The assessee subsequently opted to settle the issues under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme 2020 and filed an application to withdraw the appeal.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was the withdrawal of the appeal by the assessee due to opting for the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
आदेश/Order
Per R.L. Negi, Judicial Member:
The assessee has filed the captioned appeal against the order dated 08.08.2018 passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Karnal (for short ‘the CIT(A)], pertaining to the block period 1988-89 to 1998-99 vide which the Ld. CIT(A) has dismissed the appeal of the assessee filed against the assessment order passed u/s 158BC(b) r.w.s. 158BB(b) and 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short 'the Act').
At the outset, Ld. Counsel for the assessee submitted that the assessee has opted to settle the issues in the said appeal under the provisions of ‘Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme 2020’. The Ld. Counsel
2 further submitted that an application for withdrawal of the said appeal has already been filed. Hence, the same may be allowed and the assessee may be permitted to withdraw the said appeal.
The Ld. Departmental Representative did not oppose the application filed by the assessee.
In view of the submissions made by the Ld. Counsel for the assessee, we allow the application filed by the assessee and accordingly dismiss the appeal as withdrawn.
Order pronounced on 17.02.2021.
More judgments on Section 158BC
- Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax (Central)-3… vs Olive Overseas Private LimitedITA/783/202628 Sept 2026
- Amit Kandhari, Barakar vs DCIT, Central Circle 4(3), KolkataITSSA 51/KOL/2026[2019-2020]Status: Disposed17 Sept 2026AY 2019-2020
- Amit Kandhari, Barakar vs DCIT, Central Circle 4(3), KolakataITA 1402/KOL/2026[2020-2021]Status: Disposed17 Sept 2026AY 2020-2021
- Venad Properties Pvt. Ltd., Kerala vs DCIT, New DelhiITSSA 12/DEL/2011[01/04/1986 to 06/11/1996]Status: Disposed31 Aug 2026
- S. Krishna Kumar (HUF) vs DCIT, Central CircleITSSA 325/DEL/2005[1.04.86 to 6.11.96]Status: Disposed31 Aug 2026
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Gujarat Co-Operative Milk Marketing Federation Limited vs. Union Of INDIAGujarat · 14 Oct 2026
- Ramesh K Devadiga vs. Khernagar Nandadeep Co Operative Housing Society LTDBombay · 14 Oct 2026
- Ramesh K Devadiga And Ors vs. Khernagar Nandadeep Co-Operative Housing Society LTD And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026
- Permender Singh vs. Union Of INDIA And Ors.Calcutta · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Abdhish Dhal Samanta, Bhubaneswar vs. Chief Commissioner, CT And GST, Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026