ACIT, CIRCLE-2(2), HYDERABAD, HYDERABAD vs. GREEN FIRE AGRI COMMODITIES LTD., HYD, HYDERABAD

PDF · subscribers
ITA 263/HYD/2015Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad22 September 2021AY 2010-113 pages

In favour of the assessee: the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.

AI SummaryDismissed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal dismissed the appeal as not maintainable, citing CBDT Circular No. 17/2019 which sets a monetary limit for appeals. The issues raised were left open for future proceedings.

What were the facts?

The Revenue filed an appeal before the ITAT against an assessment order. The tax effect in the appeal was less than Rs. 50 lakhs.

What were the issues?

Whether an appeal filed by the Revenue with a tax effect below the prescribed monetary limit in CBDT Circular No. 17/2019 is maintainable before the ITAT.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 268A

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad ‘ B ‘ Bench, Hyderabad

Before: Shri S.S. Godara & Shri Inturi Rama Rao

For Respondent: Shri Rohit Mujumdar for Shri, DR. Assessee by: Sri P.V.S.S. Prasad – AR
Hearing: 21/09/2021Pronounced: 22/09/2021
1.

This is an appeal filed by the Revenue against the assessment order u/s 143(3) r.w.s. 92CA(4) r.w.s. 144C(13) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (‘the Act’ for short) of the Asst. Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle – 2(2), Hyderabad (‘the Assessing Officer; for short) dated 27.01.2015 for A.Y. 2010-11 in furtherance of the Dispute Resolution Panel, Hyderabad’s directions dated 13.11.2014 passed u/s 144C(5) of the I.T. Act.

2.

It is stated before us that the tax effect in the present appeal is less than Rs.50 lakhs and therefore, the Circular No.17/2019 dated 08.08.2019 issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) in exercise of its power vested under Sec.268A(1) of the IT Act comes into play wherein, the monetary limit for filing the appeal by the Revenue before the ITAT and various High Courts as well as Apex Court are revised with an object of reducing the tax litigation. Vide para 3 of the said circular (supra) it is stated that in cases where the tax effect in the appeals to be filed before the Appellate Tribunal does not exceed Rs.50 lakhs appeals should not be filed. Thus, taking a note of CBDT Circular No.17/2019, dated 08.08.2019 and considering the fact that the tax effect in the instant appeal is less than Rs.50 lakhs, the present appeal deserves to be dismissed as not pressed / not maintainable. However, we make it clear that the issues raised in the instant appeal are left open to be examined in the appropriate proceedings, if arises, in future. At the same time, we also make it clear that if the appeal falls in any of the exceptions referred to in the above said CBDT Circular, the Revenue is at liberty to move an application for recalling the order if so advised. Accordingly, in the light of CBDT Circular No.17/2019 dated 08/08/2019, the appeal filed by the Revenue stands dismissed.

3.

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue stands dismissed.

Order pronounced in the Open Court on 22nd September,2021.

More judgments on Section 268A

All 3,931 judgments and leading authorities on Section 268A →

Latest GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →