DCIT (E)-1(1), MUMBAI vs. INSURANCE INSTITUTE OF INDIA, MUMBAI

The assessee carried the matter before the Ld. CIT(A) by way of filing appeal who has partly allowed the appeal. Feeling aggrieved with the impugned order passed by the Ld. CIT(A) the Revenue has come up before the Tribunal by way of filing present appeals. & 1715/M/2023 3 M/s. Insurance Institute of India

The sole issue arises for determination in this case is: “As to whether the Ld. CIT(A) has erred in allowing accumulation of income as provided under section 11(2) of the Act despite the fact that the purpose of accumulation shown by the assessee in form No.10 is vague and not as per the provisions contained under section 11(2) of the Act?”

The objects of the assessee charitable institute registered under section 12A of the Act are as under: “1) To run Colleges and conduct examinations, oral and written, in insurance theory and practice and related subjects for awarding certificates, diplomas and degrees to those interested in insurance. ii) To give oral and postal tuitions, prepare and supply reading materials and similar other educative methods for encouraging and assisting the study of any subject bearing on any branch of insurance. iii) To form and maintain a Library. iv) To offer scholarships, grants and prizes for research or any other educational work bearing on insurance. v) To arrange discussions, discourses, lectures and seminars on insurance and related objects for helping those interested in insurance and related fields to improve their knowledge, expertise and skill. vi) To ascertain the law and practice relating to all matters connected with insurance and to disseminate such knowledge among those interested in insurance.”

Undisputedly administrative committee of trustees of the assessee trust in its meeting dated 23.05.2017 has approved the accumulation of surplus for the utilisation of funds following purposes as under: "1) To establish college of insurance in every state and union territory in India. 2) To invest in the development of education in the areas of Risk Management, Health Insurance, Pension Management and establishment of a portal for online delivery of insurance education. 3) To invest in Research in the areas of Risk Management, Health Insurance, Pension Management, Life and General Insurance. 4) Maintenance & Heavy repairs of Society Properties. & 1715/M/2023 4 M/s. Insurance Institute of India

No doubt in form 10 assessee trust has given a very vague and ambiguous purpose viz. "towards objects of the institutes in form A". However, we are of the considered view that when revenue has not raised any objection that the objects of the trust are not charitable in nature and so long as purposes mentioned in form 10 are for achieving the object of the trust non furnishing of the details as to the specific amount to be spent in future exemption sought for by the assessee under section 11(2) of the Act could not be denied. Honourable Gujarat High Court in case of CIT vs Bochsanwasi Shri Akshar Purshottam Public Charitable Trust 409 ITR 591 (Guj.) while deciding the identical issue held that "inaccuracy or insufficient declaration for the purpose of availing benefit under section 11(2) of the Act, would itself not be the only criteria to reject the claim of the assessee". This decision rendered by Honourable Gujarat High Court has been upheld by the Honourable Supreme Court of India in case cited as 263 taxman 247 (SC).

So when the administrative committee in its meeting has given every minute detail for the requirement to create infrastructure for the purpose of assessee trust whose primary object is to impart education related to insurance sector the Ld. CIT(A) has rightly allowed the claim made by the assessee trust. Co-ordinate bench of Tribunal in assessee's own case for A.Y. 2016-17 decided the identical issue in favour of the assessee trust. & 1715/M/2023 5 M/s. Insurance Institute of India

In view of what has been discussed above, finding no illegality or infirmity in the impugned findings returned by Ld. CIT(A) the same is upheld and both the appeals filed by the Revenue are hereby dismissed.