CIT(E) v. Bochasanwasi Shri Akshar Purshottam Public Charitable Trust

263 Taxmann 247Supreme Court of India2019#17519 most cited
5

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 292,668 Indian tax judgments — from 2019 to 2025.

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing CIT(E) v. Bochasanwasi Shri Akshar Purshottam Public Charitable Trust

INSURANCE INSTITUTE OF INDIA,MUMBAI vs. ACIT(EXEM) CIRCLE-1, MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 1610/MUM/2020[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai20 Feb 2023AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Amarjit Singh, Am & Ms. Kavitha Rajagopal, Jm Insurance Institute Of India Acit (Exem), Circle-1, C-45, Block G, Bandra Kurla Complex, Mumbai Vs. Bandra (E), Mumbai-400 051 Pan/Gir No. Aaat 11174 R (Appellant) : (Respondent) Assessee By : Shri Ketan Vajani : Shri Tejinder Pal Singh Anand Revenue By : 25.11.2022 Date Of Hearing Date Of Pronouncement : 20.02.2023 O R D E R Per Kavitha Rajagopal, J M: This Appeal Has Been Filed By The Assessee, Challenging The Order Of Learned Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals) („Ld.Cit(A) For Short), Passed U/S.250 Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 („The Act'), Pertaining To The Assessment Year („A.Y.‟ For Short) 2016-17. 2. The Assessee Has Challenged This Appeal On The Grounds Of Disallowance Of Exemption U/S. 11 R.W.S. 12A Of The Act For The Reason That The Purpose Of Accumulation U/S.11(2) Specified By The Assessee Are Vague & General & The Purposes Stated Are Beyond The Memorandum Of Association (Moa For Short) Of The Assessee. 3. The Brief Facts Are That The Assessee Is An Institution Registered Under The Societies Registration Act, 1860, Established In The Year 1955And The Assessee Was Formerly

For Appellant: Shri Ketan VajaniFor Respondent: 25.11.2022
Section 10Section 11Section 11(2)Section 12ASection 143(3)Section 250

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “C” BENCH, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI AMARJIT SINGH, AM AND MS. KAVITHA RAJAGOPAL, JM Insurance Institute of India ACIT (Exem), Circle-1, C-45, Block G, Bandra Kurla Complex, Mumbai Vs. Bandra (E), Mumbai-400 051 PAN/GIR No. AAAT 11174 R (Appellant) : (Respondent) Assessee by : Shri Ketan Vajani : Shri Tejinder Pal Singh Anand Revenue by : 25.11.2022 Date of Hearing Date of Pronouncement : 20.02.2023 O R D E R Per Kavitha Rajagopal, J M: This appeal has been filed by the assessee, challenging the order of learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) („ld.CIT(A) for short), passed u/s.…

CIT(E) v. Bochasanwasi Shri Akshar Purshottam Public Charitable Trust (263 Taxmann 247) — Cited in 5 Judgments | BharatTax