M/S. THE BANK OF TOKYO-MITSUBISHI, UFJ LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. DDIT, NEW DELHI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal allowed the assessee's ground regarding the disallowance of salaries paid to expatriates, following previous High Court and Supreme Court decisions on identical facts. The Tribunal also referred to a prior order for AY 2005-06 which had rejected the Revenue's identical contentions regarding MAT.
What were the facts?
The assessee, a bank, appealed against the disallowance of salaries paid overseas to expatriates working in India and the applicability of MAT provisions. The Revenue also filed an appeal against the deletion of additions made by the AO.
What were the issues?
Whether salaries paid to expatriates working for the Indian PE are deductible and whether MAT provisions are applicable to the assessee bank.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(2)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- CIT v. Emirates Commercial Bank Ltd.53 citing262 ITR 55 · 2003 · HC
- Kolkata in ABN Amro Bank v. JCIT13 citing97 ITD 1 · 2005 · ITAT
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH ‘D NEW DELHI
Before: SHRI SATBEER SINGH GODARA & SHRI S. RIFAUR RAHMAN
Heard together (2 matters)
Read from the judgment's own cause title. This page is filed under one of them.
PER SATBEER SINGH GODARA, J.M:
These assessee's and Revenue's cross appeals ITA Nos.3708/Del/2014 & ITA Nos.3756/Del/2014, respectively, for A.Y. 2006-07, arise against Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals)-XXV, New Delhi's order dated 31.03.2024 [Appeal No. 78/2010-11 (Old A. No. 135/2008-09, CIT(A)-XXIX)], in proceedings u/s 1
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 115JB
- Azure Knowledge Corporation Private… vs The Dy.CIT, Circle-1(1)(1), AhmedabadITA 2013/AHD/2024[2018-19]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Digjam Limited, Jamnagar vs The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 349/RJT/2025[2021-22]Status: Disposed12 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Braithwaite & Co. Ltd., Kolkata vs DCIT, Circle 1(1), KolkataITA 1076/KOL/2026[2021-2022]Status: Disposed7 Oct 2026AY 2021-2022
- DCIT, Circle-4(1)(1), Ahmedabad, Vejalpur vs Vijay M. Mistry Construction Private…ITA 964/AHD/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed6 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- DCIT, Circle-4(1)(1), Ahmedabad, Vejalpur… vs Vijay M. Mistry Construction Private…ITA 963/AHD/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed6 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Dillip Kumar Behera vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, Mayurbhanj CircleOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Tvl.Dev Construction vs. The Proper OfficerMadras · 15 Oct 2026
- Abbal Dass Arya vs. Commissioner State Goods And Services Tax CommissionerUttarakhand · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S Darbesh Medical Enterprise vs. State Of West Bengal And Ors.Calcutta · 15 Oct 2026
- J M Mhatre Infra PVT. LTD Thr. Authorized Chetan J. Mhatre vs. Union Of INDIA Thr. Secretary Dept. Of Revenue Ministry Of Finance And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026