RELIANCE INDUSTRIES LIMITED,MUMBAI vs. DY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-3(4), MUMBAI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal partly allowed the appeals of both the assessee and the revenue. Certain comparable companies were excluded from transfer pricing analysis, and other issues were remitted back to the TPO/Assessing Officer for fresh determination.
What were the facts?
Reliance Industries Ltd. (assessee) filed appeals against the orders of the CIT(A) concerning assessment years 2017-18 and 2018-19. The appeals involved issues related to transfer pricing, R&D expenses, depreciation, and disallowances under Section 14A.
What were the issues?
The key issues involved the validity of transfer pricing adjustments, allowability of weighted deductions for R&D, depreciation claims, and disallowances under Section 14A.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 35(2AB),Section 32,Section 14A,Section 115JB,Section 92C,Section 10AA,Section 80G,Section 42(1)(b)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(11)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- National Thermal Power Co. Ltd. v. CIT5,834 citing229 ITR 383 · 1998 · SC
- Godrej & Boyce Mfg. Co. Ltd. v. DCIT1,183 citing328 ITR 81 · 2010 · HC
- ACIT v. Vireet Investment Pvt. Ltd.789 citing82 Taxmann.com 415 · 2017 · HC
- Apollo Tyres Ltd. v. CIT657 citing255 ITR 273 · 2002 · SC · Read judgment
- PCIT v. Ankit125 citing416 ITR 591 · 2019 · HC
- Wipro Ltd. v. DCIT122 citing382 ITR 179 · 2016 · HC
- Nirmala L. Mehta v. A. Balasubramaniam, CIT108 citing269 ITR 1 · 2004 · HC
- CIT v. Metal & Chromium Plater (P.) Ltd.29 citing415 ITR 123 · 2019 · HC
- Vijay Industries v. CIT8 citing412 ITR 1 · 2019 · SC · Read judgment
- DCIT v. Dune Leasing & Finance Ltd.4 citing125 TTJ 87 · ITAT
- 4 citing
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “J” Bench, Mumbai
Before: Shri B.R. Baskaran (AM) & Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale (JM)
Per B.R.Baskaran (AM) :- The cross appeals filed by the assessee and Revenue relate to AY 2017-18 and 2018-19. The assessee has filed cross objection in A.Y. 2018-19. All are directed against the orders passed by Ld CIT(A)-57, Mumbai. Since certa
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 35(2AB)
- Aeon Formulations Private Limited, Chennai vs Income Tax Officer, Corporate Ward 2(1)…ITA 2481/CHNY/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed12 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Devarsons Industries Pvt.Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The D.C.I.T. Circle-1(1)(1), AhmedabadITA 2327/AHD/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed29 Sept 2026AY 2018-19
- Ceat Limited, Mumbai vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income-Tax…ITA 8146/MUM/2025[2020-21]Status: Disposed29 Sept 2026AY 2020-21
- Forbes Marshall Pvt. Ltd., Pune vs Income Tax Officer Circle 8, PuneITA 3206/PUN/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed28 Sept 2026AY 2017-18
- Pochjraja Industries Ltd., Hosur vs ACIT, Circle-1, HosurITA 1072/CHNY/2025[2013-14]Status: Disposed23 Sept 2026AY 2013-14
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Manoj Kumar Das vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S Superwealth Financial Enterprises Private Limited, Khordha vs. Joint Commissioner Good And Service Tax Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Simanchal Sahoo vs. Commissioner Of CT And GST, Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S. Prafulla Chandra Khatua, Mayurbhanj vs. The State Tax Officer Of CT And GST, MayurbhanjOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S.Sidhivinayak Roadways, Sundergarh vs. Commissioner Of GST And Central Excise, Rourkela Commissionerate, RourkelaOrissa · 15 Oct 2026