ITO, WARD-3(5), NAGPUR vs. SHRI RUPRAO BALIRAM RAUT, NAGPUR

PDF · subscribers
ITA 137/NAG/2017Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur22 February 2021AY 2009-102 pages
AI SummaryDismissed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal dismissed the appeal as not pressed/maintainable, citing CBDT Circular No. 17/2019 which sets monetary limits for filing appeals. The issues raised were left open for future proceedings.

What were the facts?

The Revenue filed an appeal before the ITAT against an order of the CIT(A) for AY 2009-10. The tax effect in the appeal was less than Rs. 50 lakhs.

What were the issues?

Whether the Revenue's appeal is maintainable before the ITAT given the tax effect and CBDT Circular No. 17/2019.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 268A

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, BENCH, NAGPUR

Before: SHRI INTURI RAMA RAO, AM & SHRI S. S. VISWANETHRA RAVI, JM

For Appellant: Shri Himesh Demle
Hearing: 12.02.2021Pronounced: 22.02.2021

This an appeal filed by the Revenue directed against the order passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) – 2, Nagpur (‘CIT(A)’ for short) dated 13.01.2017 for the assessment year 2009-10. 2. It is stated before us that the tax effect in the present appeal is less than Rs.50 lakhs and therefore, the Circular No.17/2019 dated 08.08.2019 issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) in exercise of its power vested under Sec.268A(1) of the IT Act comes into play wherein, the monetary limit for filing the appeal by the Revenue before the ITAT and various High Courts as well as Apex Court are revised with an object of reducing the tax litigation. Vide para 3 of the said circular (supra) it is stated that in cases where the tax effect in the appeals to be filed before the Appellate Tribunal does not exceed Rs.50 lakhs appeals should not be filed. Thus, taking a note

of CBDT Circular No.17/2019, dated 08.08.2019 and considering the fact that the tax effect in the instant appeal is less than Rs.50 lakhs, the present appeal deserves to be dismissed as not pressed / not maintainable. However, we make it clear that the issues raised in the instant appeal are left open to be examined in the appropriate proceedings, if arises, in future. At the same time, we also make it clear that if the appeal falls in any of the exceptions referred to in the above said CBDT Circular, the Revenue is at liberty to move an application for recalling the order if so advised. Accordingly, in the light of CBDT Circular No.17/2019 dated 08/08/2019, the appeal filed by the Revenue stands dismissed.

3.

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue stands dismissed. Order pronounced on this the 22nd day of February, 2021. (S. S. VISWANETHRA RAVI) (INTURI RAMA RAO) "याियक सद"य/JUDICIAL MEMBER लेखा सद"य/ACCOUNTANT MEMBER पुणे / Pune; "दनांक / Dated : 22nd February, 2021. Yamini आदेश क" "ितिलिप अ"ेिषत / Copy of the Order forwarded to : अपीलाथ" / The Appellant.

1.

""यथ" / The Respondent.

2.3.

The CIT(A)-2, Nagpur.

4.

Pr.CIT(2), Nagpur. िवभागीय "ितिनिध, आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण, नागपुर /

5.

DR, ITAT, “Nagpur” Pune; गाड" फ़ाइल / Guard File. 6. आदेशानुसार / BY ORDER, //// Senior Private Secretary आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण, पुणे / ITAT, Pune.

More judgments on Section 268A

All 3,931 judgments and leading authorities on Section 268A →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →