ACCOUNTS OFFICER (O&M), JALORE, JODHPUR VIDYUT VITRAN NIGAM LIMITED,JALORE vs. ITO-TDS-II, JODHPUR

PDF · subscribers
ITA 529/JODH/2009Status: DisposedITAT Jodhpur27 October 2023AY 2007-083 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal held that no TDS is deductible on the purchase of machinery. The matter was remanded to the Assessing Officer to exclude the purchase amounts and re-compute TDS only on the work contract for installation.

What were the facts?

The assessee made payments for the purchase and installation of machinery. The Assessing Officer passed an order under Section 201/201(1A) for non-deduction of TDS. The CIT(A) held that the entire payment was for a composite contract attracting TDS provisions.

What were the issues?

Whether TDS is deductible under Section 194C on payments for purchase of machinery and whether such payments form part of a composite contract attracting TDS on the entire amount.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 201,Section 201(1A),Section 194C

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, JODHPUR BENCH ‘DB’: JODHPUR

For Respondent: Mr. Rajeev Mohan, JCIT-DR
Hearing: 22/09/2023Pronounced: 27/10/2023

Heard together (3 matters)

ITA No.568/JODH/2008
ITA No.574/JODH/2008
ITA No.577/JODH/2008

Read from the judgment's own cause title. This page is filed under one of them.

ORDER PER BENCH: All the above six appeals are preferred by the Assessee against the orders of ld. CIT(A), Jodhpur dated 05.08.2008 & 16.07.2009 and are being adjudicated by the common order.

2.

The order u/s 201/201 (1A) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 has been passed by the ITO-TDS-II, Jodhpur resulting in demand of tax u/s 201 interest u/s 201(1A). The matter reached to the Ld. CIT(A) and held that the total payments made by the assessee are liable to the provisions u/s 194C of the IT Act.

3.

The Hon’ble High Court of Rajsthan at Jodhpur, has remanded the matter to the Tribunal to adjudicate afresh on merits. On going through the record, we find that the payments made by the assessee concern are of payments for purchase of machinery and payments for installation of machinery under works contract. The Ld. CIT(A) held that entire purchase is a composite contract and held that going to the nature that the activity is a composite contract, hence, the provisions of TDS are attracted on the entire amount.

4.

On the contrary, we find that no TDS is deductible on the purchase of machinery, hence, keeping in view the facts on record, we remand the matter to the file of ITO-TDS-II to exclude the amounts paid for purchase of machinery and reiterate that no provisions of TDS are attracted for the purchase of machinery. The ITO-TDS-II is hereby directed to re-compute the tax deductible as per the provisions of 194C to the extent of work contract given in the erection/installation of the machinery. 5. In the result, all the appeals of the Assessee are allowed for statistical purposes.

Order pronounced in the open Court on 27th October, 2023.

More judgments on Section 201

All 1,566 judgments and leading authorities on Section 201 →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →