SATISH KUMAR DHINGRA,HARYANA vs. ACIT CIRCLE-4(1), GURGAON

ITA 1060/DEL/2022Status: DisposedITAT Delhi07 February 2023AY 2017-1826 pages
AI SummaryDismissed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal held that the AO's assessment order was erroneous and prejudicial to the interest of revenue as it lacked proper inquiry and failed to consider the jurisdictional High Court's consistent view that interest on enhanced compensation is taxable. Therefore, the revisionary power was rightly exercised.

What were the facts?

The assessees had initially shown interest on enhanced compensation as income and claimed deduction, but later revised their returns to omit this income. The Principal CIT initiated revision proceedings under Section 263, alleging the Assessing Officer (AO) failed to conduct proper inquiry and applied his mind.

What were the issues?

Whether the AO's assessment order was erroneous and prejudicial to the revenue due to lack of inquiry regarding the taxability of interest on enhanced compensation, and whether the Principal CIT was justified in exercising revisionary powers under Section 263.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 263,Section 143(3),Section 139(4),Section 139(5),Section 57,Section 10(37),Section 56(2)(viii),Section 145A,Section 28

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Cases cited in this judgment(30)Show list

Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH “A”: NEW DELHI

Before: SHRI SHAMIM YAHYA & SHRI ANUBHAV SHARMA

For Appellant: Smt. Kavita Jha, Adv
Hearing: 23/11/2022Pronounced: 07/02/2023

PER ANUBHAV SHARMA, J. M.: The present four appeals have been preferred by the Assessee against the order u/s 263 the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred as „the Act‟) dated 29.03.2022 of Ld. Pr. CIT, Faridabad (hereinafter referred as Ld. Revisional Authority) arising out of an the assessment order dated 14.11.2019 passed u/s 143(3) of

The order continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

Create a free accountSign in

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

More judgments on Section 263

All 13,616 judgments and leading authorities on Section 263 →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →