CIT v. Ganpat Ram Bishnoi
152 Taxmann 242High Court2006#4003 most cited
What is CIT v. Ganpat Ram Bishnoi authority for?
Revision under section 263 cannot be invoked merely because the Assessing Officer did not conduct exhaustive enquiries. Jurisdiction under section 263 is not for re-examining the assessment process or for conducting further enquiries if the initial assessment was based on the satisfaction of the Assessing Officer.
30
judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 292,668 Indian tax judgments — from 2017 to 2026.
Also referred to as
CIT v. Ganpat Ram Bishnoi · section 263 · revision · inadequate enquiry · lack of enquiry · prejudicial to interest of revenue · Assessing Officer satisfaction · process of assessment
Also reported as
198 CTR 546
Sections most often in play
Issues it is cited on
Judgments citing CIT v. Ganpat Ram Bishnoi
Showing 1–20 of 30 · Page 1 of 2