← All Benches

ITAT Ranchi Bench

1,968 judgments

ABHISHEK GOURASARIA,JAMSHEDPUR vs ACIT , JAMSHEDPUR

ITA 43/RAN/2023[2013-14]Status: Disposed6/10/2025AY 2013-14

SHRI GEORGE MATHAN (Judicial Member), SHRI RATNESH NANDAN SAHAY (Accountant Member)

AMIT REALTORS PRIVATE LIMITED,KOLKATA vs DCIT, CIRCLE-3, BOKARO, BOKARO

ITA 243/RAN/2023[2012-13]Status: Disposed6/10/2025AY 2012-13

LATE PROMOD KUMAR JAYASWAL,RANCHI vs ACIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, RANCHI

ITA 111/RAN/2023[1996-97]Status: Disposed6/10/2025AY 1996-97

SHRI GEORGE MATHAN (Judicial Member), SHRI RATNESH NANDAN SAHAY (Accountant Member)

LATE PROMOD KUMAR JAYASWAL,RANCHI vs ACIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, RANCHI

ITA 110/RAN/2023[1995-96]Status: Disposed6/10/2025AY 1995-96

LATE PROMOD KUMAR JAYASWAL,RANCHI vs ACIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, RANCHI

ITA 109/RAN/2023[1994-95]Status: Disposed6/10/2025AY 1994-95

LATE PROMOD KUMAR JAYASWAL,RANCHI vs ACIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, RANCHI

ITA 108/RAN/2023[1993-94]Status: Disposed6/10/2025AY 1993-94

SHRI GEORGE MATHAN (Judicial Member), SHRI RATNESH NANDAN SAHAY (Accountant Member)

PROMOD KUMAR JAYASWAL,RANCHI vs ACIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, RANCHI

ITA 107/RAN/2023[1992-93]Status: Disposed6/10/2025AY 1992-93

LATE PRAMOD KUMAR JAYASWAL,RANCHI vs ACIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, RANCHI

ITA 106/RAN/2023[1991-92]Status: Disposed6/10/2025AY 1991-92

SHRI GEORGE MATHAN (Judicial Member), SHRI RATNESH NANDAN SAHAY (Accountant Member)

MINIMAYA SALES PRIVATE LIMITED.,KOLKATA vs INCOME TAX, WARD-2(5), RANCHI, RANCHI

ITA 62/RAN/2022[2017-18]Status: Disposed6/10/2025AY 2017-18

SHRI GEORGE MATHAN (Judicial Member), SHRI RATNESH NANDAN SAHAY (Accountant Member)

HOLYFAITH TRIBAL W AND D TRUST ,RANCHI vs ITO EXEMPTION WARD, RANCHI

ITA 69/RAN/2024[2016-17]Status: Disposed29/9/2025AY 2016-17

SHRI SONJOY SARMA (Judicial Member), SHRI RATNESH NANDAN SAHAY (Accountant Member)

VISHWA NIRMALA DHARMA TRUST JAMSHEDPUR,JAMSHEDPUR vs EXEMPTION WARD, JSR, JAMSHDPUR

ITA 306/RAN/2024[NOT APPLICABLE]Status: Disposed18/9/2025

SHRI SONJOY SARMA, JUDICIAL MEMBER SHRI RATNESH NANDAN SAHAY (Accountant Member)

VISHWA NIRMALA DHARMA TRUST JAMSHEDPUR,JAMSHEDPUR vs EXEMPTION WARD, JSR, JAMSHEDPUR

ITA 305/RAN/2024[NOT APPLICABLE]Status: Disposed18/9/2025

SHRI SONJOY SARMA, JUDICIAL MEMBER SHRI RATNESH NANDAN SAHAY (Accountant Member)

G D RUNGTA FOUNDATION,JAMSHEDPUR vs EXEMPTION WARD, JSR, JAMSHEDPUR

ITA 304/RAN/2024[NOT APPLICABLE]Status: Disposed18/9/2025

SHRI SONJOY SARMA, JUDICIAL MEMBER SHRI RATNESH NANDAN SAHAY (Accountant Member)

G D RUNGTA FOUNDATION,JAMSHEDPUR vs EXEMPTION WARD, JSR, JAMSHEDPUR

ITA 303/RAN/2024[NOT APPLICABLE]Status: Disposed18/9/2025

SHRI SONJOY SARMA, JUDICIAL MEMBER SHRI RATNESH NANDAN SAHAY (Accountant Member)

SATYALOK KRIYA YOGA,JAMSHEDPUR vs EXEMPTION WARD, JSR, JAMSHEDPUR

ITA 301/RAN/2024[NOT APPLICABLE]Status: Disposed18/9/2025

SHRI SONJOY SARMA, JUDICIAL MEMBER SHRI RATNESH NANDAN SAHAY (Accountant Member)

SATYALOK KRIYA YOGA,JAMSHEDPUR vs EXEMPTION WARD, JSR, JAMSHEDPUR

ITA 300/RAN/2024[NOT APPLICABLE]Status: Disposed18/9/2025

SHRI SONJOY SARMA, JUDICIAL MEMBER SHRI RATNESH NANDAN SAHAY (Accountant Member)

MOHAMMAD ASIF RAZA,JUGSALAI vs ITO, C.H.AREA

ITA 151/RAN/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed16/9/2025AY 2017-18

SHRI SONJOY SARMA (Judicial Member), SHRI RATNESH NANDAN SAHAY (Accountant Member)

INCOME TAX OFFICER, BOKARO vs AJIT KUMAR, BOKARO

ITA 339/RAN/2024[2013-14]Status: Disposed16/9/2025AY 2013-14

Shri Sonjoy Sarma (Judicial Member), Shri Ratnesh Nandan Sahay (Accountant Member)

VIKASH KUMAR TAPADIA,JAMSHEDPUR vs INCOME TAX OFFICER, JAMSHEDPUR

ITA 235/RAN/2024[2018-19]Status: Disposed16/9/2025AY 2018-19

Shri Sonjoy Sarma (Judicial Member), Shri Ratnesh Nandan Sahay (Accountant Member)

KARNI MANSION PVT LTD,KOLKATA vs INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 1(4), JAMSHEDPUR

ITA 344/RAN/2024[2012-2013]Status: Disposed15/9/2025AY 2012-2013

the Ld. CIT(A), where the appeal of the assessee was dismissed due to non-prosecution by upholding the order of the AO. Aggrieved by the above order, the assessee is in appeal before this Tribunal raising various grounds. However, the primary contention of the assessee is that the impugned order passed by the Ld. CIT(A) without giving proper opportunity of being heard to the assessee. Therefore, the order of Ld. CIT(A) may be quashed.