← All Benches

ITAT Ranchi Bench

1,968 judgments

KAMLA EDUCATIONAL TRUST,DEOGHAR vs ITO WARD 3(3), DUMKA

ITA 265/RAN/2025[2023-2024]Status: Disposed24/11/2025AY 2023-2024

SHRI GEORGE MATHAN (Judicial Member)

CHHABI SAHA,JAMSHEDPUR vs ITO WARD 1 (1) JAMSHEDPUR, JAMSHEDPUR

ITA 202/RAN/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed24/11/2025AY 2017-18

SHRI GEORGE MATHAN (Judicial Member)

SANJAY KUMAR JAISWAL,DHANBAD vs ITO, DHANBAD

ITA 103/RAN/2025[2016-17]Status: Disposed24/11/2025AY 2016-17

SHRI GEORGE MATHAN (Judicial Member)

KROSS LIMITED,ADITYAPUR vs DCIT, CIRCLE-1, JAMSHEDPUR

ITA 98/RAN/2025[2013-2014]Status: Disposed20/11/2025AY 2013-2014

the CIT(A) where appeal was dismissed on wrong facts.4. Dissatisfied with the above order, assessee is in appeal before this Tribunal.

KROSS LIMITED,ADITYAPUR vs DCIT,CIRCLE-1, JAMSHEDPUR

ITA 97/RAN/2025[2013-2014]Status: Disposed20/11/2025AY 2013-2014

the CIT(A) where appeal was dismissed on wrong facts.4. Dissatisfied with the above order, assessee is in appeal before this Tribunal.

NATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS AND CRIME CONTROL BUREAU,RANCHI vs COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX EXEMPTION, RANCHI, RANCHI

ITA 48/RAN/2025[2025-26]Status: Disposed20/11/2025AY 2025-26

the Tribunal. The assessee stated that necessary documents and explanations could not be furnished due to unavoidable circumstances.4. When the appeals were called for hearing, although notices had been duly served, none appeared on behalf of the assessee. Since the matters were pending for a considerable time, the Bench proceeded to hear the DR and perused the records. The Ld. DR submitted that the assessee is a habitual non-compliant entity, having failed to respond before the CIT (Exempt

NATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS AND CRIME CONTROL BUREAU,RANCHI vs COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX EXEMPTION, RANCHI , RANCHI

ITA 47/RAN/2025[2025-26]Status: Disposed20/11/2025AY 2025-26

the Tribunal. The assessee stated that necessary documents and explanations could not be furnished due to unavoidable circumstances.4. When the appeals were called for hearing, although notices had been duly served, none appeared on behalf of the assessee. Since the matters were pending for a considerable time, the Bench proceeded to hear the DR and perused the records. The Ld. DR submitted that the assessee is a habitual non-compliant entity, having failed to respond before the CIT (Exempt

VIKAS SEVA NIKETAN,NEORI VIKAS vs INCOME TAX OFFICER, EXEMPTION WARD

ITA 42/RAN/2025[2025-26]Status: Disposed20/11/2025AY 2025-26

SHRI GEORGE MATHAN (Judicial Member), SHRI RATNESH NANDAN SAHAY (Accountant Member)

NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF STUDY AND RESEARCH IN LAW,RANCHI vs ASST. DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX ,CPC, BENGALURU

ITA 399/RAN/2024[2019-2020]Status: Disposed20/11/2025AY 2019-2020

SHRI PRADIP KUMAR CHOUBEY (Judicial Member), SHRI RATNESH NANDAN SAHAY (Accountant Member)

HIRALAL AGENCIES PVT. LTD.,,RANCHI vs DCIT, CIRCLE-1, RANCHI

ITA 288/RAN/2024[2011-12]Status: Disposed20/11/2025AY 2011-12

the Ld. CIT(A) where appeal of the assessee was dismissed sustaining the order of the AO.

VISION & VISION PRIVATE LIMITED,JAMSHEDPUR vs ACUT/ DCIT CIRCLE 1, JAMSHEDPUR

ITA 183/RAN/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed19/11/2025AY 2018-19

Shri Sonjoy Sarma (Judicial Member), Shri Ratnesh Nandan Sahay (Accountant Member)

M/S MUNNA CONSTRUCTION,JAMSHEDPUR vs DCIT, CIRCLE-1, JAMSHEDPUR

ITA 41/RAN/2025[2016-17]Status: Disposed17/11/2025AY 2016-17

the Id. CIT(A), though the Id.CIT(A) has issued notices on various dates as mentioned in page 4 of the order, however, the assessee could not furnish the detail to substantiate its claim. Also before the Tribunal, none appeared on behalf of the assessee. This being so, in the interest of justice, the issues in these appeals are restored to the file of Id.AO for readjudication. Liberty is granted to the assessee to challenge all legal issues that it so desires to raise before the Assessing O

M/S MUNNA CONSTRUCTION,JAMSHEDPUR vs DCIT, CIRCLE-1,, JAMSHEDPUR

ITA 40/RAN/2025[2014-15]Status: Disposed17/11/2025AY 2014-15

the Id. CIT(A), though the Id.CIT(A) has issued notices on various dates as mentioned in page 4 of the order, however, the assessee could not furnish the detail to substantiate its claim. Also before the Tribunal, none appeared on behalf of the assessee. This being so, in the interest of justice, the issues in these appeals are restored to the file of Id.AO for readjudication. Liberty is granted to the assessee to challenge all legal issues that it so desires to raise before the Assessing O

PRITAM JAISWAL,DUMKA vs INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD - 3(1), DEOGHAR, DEOGHAR

ITA 485/RAN/2024[2018-2019]Status: Disposed17/11/2025AY 2018-2019

Shri Sonjoy Sarma (Judicial Member), Shri Ratnesh Nandan Sahay (Accountant Member)

PRITAM JAISWAL,DUMKA vs INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD - 3(1), DEOGHAR

ITA 484/RAN/2024[2018-2019]Status: Disposed17/11/2025AY 2018-2019

Shri Sonjoy Sarma (Judicial Member), Shri Ratnesh Nandan Sahay (Accountant Member)

GARIMA CONSTRUCTION,RANCHI vs ITO, WARD-1(1), RANCHI

ITA 483/RAN/2024[22-23]Status: Disposed17/11/2025

Shri Sonjoy Sarma (Judicial Member), Shri Ratnesh Nandan Sahay (Accountant Member)

KONDA KARABI,JAMSHEDPUR vs DCIT, CIRCLE-1, JAMSHEDPUR

ITA 4/RAN/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed12/11/2025AY 2018-19

SHRI SONJOY SARMA (Judicial Member), SHRI RATNESH NANDAN SAHAY (Accountant Member)

M/S NANDLAL KESHARDEO,RANCHI vs ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE (1), RANCHI

ITA 15/RAN/2025[2016-2017]Status: Disposed12/11/2025AY 2016-2017

SHRI GEORGE MATHAN (Judicial Member), SHRI RATNESH NANDAN SAHAY (Accountant Member)

JHARKHAND INDUSTRIES & TRADE ASSICIATION,DHANBAD vs CIT, EXEMPTION, PATNA

ITA 328/RAN/2024[AY 2024-25]Status: Disposed12/11/2025

Shri Pradip Kumar Choubey (Judicial Member), Shri Ratnesh Nandan Sahay (Accountant Member)

JHARKHAND INDUSTRIES & TRADE ASSOCIATION,DHANBAD vs CIT, EXEMPTION, PATNA

ITA 327/RAN/2024[2023-24]Status: Disposed12/11/2025AY 2023-24

Shri Pradip Kumar Choubey (Judicial Member), Shri Ratnesh Nandan Sahay (Accountant Member)