JHARKHAND INDUSTRIES & TRADE ASSICIATION,DHANBAD vs. CIT, EXEMPTION, PATNA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal remitted the matter back to the CIT(E) to provide the assessee with another opportunity to produce all relevant documents and comply with notices. The CIT(E) was directed to hear the assessee and then decide on the grant of regular registration u/s 12A as deemed fit and proper.
What were the facts?
The assessee, a society registered under the Societies Registration Act, 1860, with provisional registration u/s 12A, applied for regular registration u/s 12A(1)(ac)(iii) of the Income Tax Act. The CIT(E) rejected this application due to the assessee's failure to produce bank ledger details, comply with a specific date, and submit evidence of expenditures and beneficiary details.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT(E) was justified in rejecting the assessee's application for regular registration u/s 12A based on non-compliance and non-submission of documents, and if the assessee deserves another opportunity to substantiate its case.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 12A,Section 12A(1)(ac)(iii),Section 12A(1)(ac)(vi),Section 11,Section 2(15)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL BENCH-RANCHI VIRTUAL HEARING AT KOLKATA Before Shri Pradip Kumar Choubey, Judicial Member and Shri Ratnesh Nandan Sahay, Accountant Member I.T.A. Nos.307, 327 & 328/Ran/2024 Assessment Years: 2022-23, 2023-24 & 2024-25 Jharkhand Industries & Trade Association............................……….……Appellant Tiwari Market, Bank More, Tiwari Gali, Dhanbad, Jharkhand – 826001. [PAN: AACAJ6085D] vs. CIT (Exemption), Patna.....…...…..….…..….........……........……...…..…..Respondent Appearances by: Shri M. K. Choudhury, AR, appeared on behalf of the appellant. Shri Swaroop Singh, CIT-DR, appeared on behalf of the Respondent. Date of concluding the hearing : October 30, 2025 Date of pronouncing the order : November 12, 2025 Per Pradip Kumar Choubey, Judicial Member:
All the captioned appeals have been preferred by the assessee for the assessment years 2022-23, 2023-24 & 2024-25 against separate orders all dated 25.05.2024 of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption), Patna [hereinafter referred to as ‘CIT(E)’] rejecting the application filed in Form 10AB for grant of regular registration u/s 12A(1)(ac)(iii) of the Income Tax Act (hereinafter referred to as t
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 12A
- Desire Foundation, Jaipur vs Income Tax Officer, JaipurITA 1646/JPR/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Sanskardham Nandan, Mehsana vs CIT(Exemption), AhmedabadITA 2980/AHD/2026[2025-26]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2025-26
- Global University Foundation, Hyderabad vs CIT(Exemption), HyderabadITA 777/HYD/2026[2026-27]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2026-27
- Global University Foundation, Hyderabad vs CIT(Exemption), HyderabadITA 776/HYD/2026[2026-27]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2026-27
- Shiva Shiksha Samiti, Deendayal Puram, Up… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward-Exemption, Agra…ITA 415/AGR/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Manoj Kumar Das vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S Superwealth Financial Enterprises Private Limited, Khordha vs. Joint Commissioner Good And Service Tax Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Simanchal Sahoo vs. Commissioner Of CT And GST, Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S. Prafulla Chandra Khatua, Mayurbhanj vs. The State Tax Officer Of CT And GST, MayurbhanjOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S.Sidhivinayak Roadways, Sundergarh vs. Commissioner Of GST And Central Excise, Rourkela Commissionerate, RourkelaOrissa · 15 Oct 2026