← All Benches

ITAT Hyderabad Bench

10,989 judgments

BABUGARI KAREEM BASHA,KURNOOL vs INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1, NANDYAL

ITA 1447/HYD/2025[2013-14]Status: Disposed4/2/2026AY 2013-14

SHRI VIJAY PAL RAO (Vice President), SHRI MADHUSUDAN SAWDIA (Accountant Member)

ACIT., CIRCLE-5(1), HYDERABAD vs ENGENRIN HYDRO POWER LIMITED, HYDERABAD

ITA 831/HYD/2024[2018-19]Status: Disposed4/2/2026AY 2018-19

SHRI G. MANJUNATHA, HON’BLE (Accountant Member), SHRI RAVISH SOOD, HON’BLE (Judicial Member)

ACIT., CIRCLE-5(1), HYDERABAD vs ENGENRIN HYDRO POWER LIMITED, HYDERABAD

ITA 830/HYD/2024[2018-19]Status: Disposed4/2/2026AY 2018-19

SHRI RAVISH SOOD, HON’BLE (Judicial Member)

ACIT., CIRCLE-5(1), HYDERABAD vs ENGENRIN HYDRO POWER LIMITED, HYDERABAD

ITA 829/HYD/2024[2017-18]Status: Disposed4/2/2026AY 2017-18

SHRI RAVISH SOOD, HON’BLE (Judicial Member)

ACIT., CIRCLE-5(1), HYDERABAD vs ENGENRIN HYDRO POWER LIMITED, HYDERABAD

ITA 828/HYD/2024[2016-17]Status: Disposed4/2/2026AY 2016-17

SHRI G. MANJUNATHA, HON’BLE (Accountant Member), SHRI RAVISH SOOD, HON’BLE (Judicial Member)

BA CONTINUUM INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs DCIT., CIRCLE-1(1), HYDERABAD

ITA 368/HYD/2024[2005-06]Status: Disposed4/2/2026AY 2005-06

SHRI RAVISH SOOD, HON'BLE (Judicial Member), SHRI MADHUSUDAN SAWDIA HON'BLE (Accountant Member)

APMDC SCCL SULIYARI COAL COMPANY LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs DCIT, CIRCLE 1(1), HYDERBAD

ITA 2272/HYD/2025[2016-17]Status: Disposed30/1/2026AY 2016-17

Shri Manjunatha G. (Accountant Member), Shri Ravish Sood (Judicial Member)

APMDC SCCL SULIYARI COAL COMPANY LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs DCIT, CIRCLE 1(1), HYDERABAD

ITA 2271/HYD/2025[2015-16]Status: Disposed30/1/2026AY 2015-16

Shri Manjunatha G. (Accountant Member), Shri Ravish Sood (Judicial Member)

MAHESH KUMAR BHATI,HYDERABAD vs ITO, WARD 7(1), HYDERABAD

ITA 1860/HYD/2025[2020-2021]Status: Disposed30/1/2026AY 2020-2021

transfer making it a long term capital asset whereas the A.O. has treated the same as short term capital asset. 4. The assessment made by learned A.O. and upheld by the CIT(A) is incorrect as while computing capital gains indexed cost of acquisition has not been considered leading to excess assessment. 7. For these and other ground which may be raised during OR before the

CHANDINI DUVVURI,HYDERABAD vs ITO, (INT TAXN)-1, HYDERABAD

ITA 1855/HYD/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed30/1/2026AY 2017-18

Shri Manjunatha G. (Accountant Member), Shri Ravish Sood (Judicial Member)

SUJATHA SUNKARA BY L/R GANGA RAO SUNKARA,NIZAMABAD vs ITO, WARD- 3, NIZAMABAD, NIZAMABAD

ITA 1844/HYD/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed30/1/2026AY 2017-18

CHANDINI DUVVURI,HYDERABAD vs ITO, (INT TAXN)-1 , HYDERABAD

ITA 1842/HYD/2025[2016-17]Status: Disposed30/1/2026AY 2016-17

Shri Manjunatha G. (Accountant Member), Shri Ravish Sood (Judicial Member)

INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-8(1), HYDERABAD vs DAGUMATI SWATHI, HYDERABAD

ITA 1638/HYD/2025[2013-14]Status: Disposed30/1/2026AY 2013-14

SHRI RAVISH SOOD, HON'BLE (Judicial Member), SHRI MADHUSUDAN SAWDIA HON'BLE (Accountant Member)

ANKIT JAIN, HYDERABAD. vs DCIT., CENTRAL CIRCLE -1(2), HYDERABAD.

ITA 1545/HYD/2025[2020-21]Status: Disposed30/1/2026AY 2020-21

us: "1. The Learned First Appellate Authority, is not justified in conforming addition of Rs.7.44,800/- as unexplained cash credit u/s. 69 made by the Ld. Assessing Officer 2. a) The Learned First Appellate Authority, in the facts and circumstances of the case, is not justified in not appreciating the appellant's claim that he has not paid any cash for purchase of shops. b) The Learned First Appellate Authority, is not justified in confirming the action of the Ld. Assessing Officer in makin

ANKIT JAIN,HYDERABAD. vs ACIT., CENTRAL CIRCLE - 1(2), HYDERABAD

ITA 1544/HYD/2025[2019-20]Status: Disposed30/1/2026AY 2019-20

us: "1. The Learned First Appellate Authority, is not justified in conforming addition of Rs.7.44,800/- as unexplained cash credit u/s. 69 made by the Ld. Assessing Officer 2. a) The Learned First Appellate Authority, in the facts and circumstances of the case, is not justified in not appreciating the appellant's claim that he has not paid any cash for purchase of shops. b) The Learned First Appellate Authority, is not justified in confirming the action of the Ld. Assessing Officer in makin

APMDC SCCL SULIYARI COAL COMPANY LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs DCIT., CIRCLE-1(1), HYDERABAD

ITA 1529/HYD/2025[2019-20]Status: Disposed30/1/2026AY 2019-20

Shri Manjunatha G. (Accountant Member), Shri Ravish Sood (Judicial Member)

APMDC SCCL SULIYARI COAL COMPANY LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs DCIT., CIRCLE- 1(1), HYDERABAD

ITA 1515/HYD/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed30/1/2026AY 2018-19

Shri Manjunatha G. (Accountant Member), Shri Ravish Sood (Judicial Member)

APMDC SCCL SULIYARI COAL COMPANY LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs DCIT., CIRLE-1(1), HYDERABAD

ITA 1514/HYD/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed30/1/2026AY 2017-18

Shri Manjunatha G. (Accountant Member), Shri Ravish Sood (Judicial Member)

APMDC SCCL SULIYARI COAL COMPANY LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs DCIT., CIRCLE-1(1), HYDERABAD

ITA 1501/HYD/2025[2016-17]Status: Disposed30/1/2026AY 2016-17

Shri Manjunatha G. (Accountant Member), Shri Ravish Sood (Judicial Member)

SYED OMER,HYDERABAD vs ITO, WARD-8(1), HYDERABAD

ITA 1404/HYD/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed30/1/2026AY 2018-19