← All Benches

ITAT Hyderabad Bench

10,989 judgments

TOURS5 COM,HYDERABAD vs ITO, WARD-9(1), HYDERABAD

ITA 631/HYD/2025[2016-17]Status: Disposed7/7/2025AY 2016-17

TOURS5 COM,HYDERABAD vs ITO., WARD-9(1), HYDERABAD

ITA 630/HYD/2025[2016-17]Status: Disposed7/7/2025AY 2016-17

SRI MODH VISA GOWBHUJA SAJNA,HYDERABAD vs DCIT., EXEMPTION CIRCLE-1(1), HYDERABAD

ITA 582/HYD/2025[2019-20]Status: Disposed7/7/2025AY 2019-20

us (as uploaded): "1. The Orders of the lower authorities in the case Appellant are contrary to the facts of the case and the Provisions of Law.

GAYATRI ENERGY VENTURES PRIVATE LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs ACIT., CIRCLE-2(1), HYDERABAD

ITA 467/HYD/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed7/7/2025AY 2018-19

SHRI VIJAY PAL RAO (Vice President), SHRI MANJUNATHA G (Accountant Member)

SAHODHAR REDDY MUDDASANI,HYDERABAD vs DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE - 1(3), HYDERABAD

ITA 444/HYD/2025[2019-20]Status: Disposed7/7/2025AY 2019-20

SHRI VIJAY PAL RAO (Vice President), SHRI MANJUNATHA G (Accountant Member)

ATCHYUTA RAMAIAH TALLURI,HYDERABAD vs ITO., WARD-11(4), HYDERABAD

ITA 271/HYD/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed7/7/2025AY 2017-18

us: “1. On the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the order passed by the learned Commissioner (Appeals)/NFAC is erroneous and unsustainable on facts and in law apart from being passed in violation of principles of natural justice.

YEDUKONDALU KATREDDY,HYDERABAD vs ITO., WARD-12(1), HYDERABAD

ITA 163/HYD/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed7/7/2025AY 2018-19

SHAIK MAHABOOB BASHA,ANANTAPUR vs ITO, WARD-1, HINDUPUR

ITA 150/HYD/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed7/7/2025AY 2017-18

us: “1) The order of the learned CIT (A) is erroneous both on facts and in law; 2) The learned CIT (A) erred in deciding the issue without providing proper opportunity to the appellant herein; 3) The learned CIT (A) ought to have provided further opportunity to the appellant before deciding the appeal ex-parte; 4) The learned CIT (A) ought to have considered the issues on merits and held that the deposits were made from out of the business income of the appellant; 5) The learned CIT (A) oug

AMBABHAVANI JETTEM,MAHABUBNAGAR vs INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1, MAHBUBNAGAR

ITA 604/HYD/2024[2017-18]Status: Disposed7/7/2025AY 2017-18

SHRI VIJAY PAL RAO (Vice President), SHRI MANJUNATHA G (Accountant Member)

NETMATRIX CROP CARE PRIVATE LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs DCIT., CIRCLE-5(1), HYDERABAD

ITA 599/HYD/2025[2020-2021]Status: Disposed4/7/2025AY 2020-2021

PINKI FRESH FOODS LIMITED,CHITTOOR vs ITO., WARD-1, CHITTOOR

ITA 1151/HYD/2024[2015-16]Status: Disposed4/7/2025AY 2015-16

us :

PENDURTHY VENKATA SUBBAIAH CHOWDARY AND SARADAMBA MEMORIAL TRUST,HYDERABAD vs CIT (EXEMPTIONS), HYDERABAD

ITA 650/HYD/2025[2025-26]Status: Heard3/7/2025AY 2025-26

Shri Vijay Pal Rao, Vice-President A N D Shri Manjunatha, G. (Accountant Member)

KMV FOUNDATION,HYDERABAD vs CIT(EXEMPTIONS), HYDERABAD

ITA 641/HYD/2025[2025-26]Status: Disposed3/7/2025AY 2025-26

Shri Vijay Pal Rao (Vice President), Shri Manjunatha, G. (Accountant Member)

GANGA REDDY GIDDE,HYDERABAD vs ITO., WARD-1, NIZAMABAD

ITA 541/HYD/2025[2012-13]Status: Disposed3/7/2025AY 2012-13

SHRI MANJUNATHA G (Accountant Member), SHRI RAVISH SOOD (Judicial Member)

SRINIVAS REDDY MEREDDY,RANGAREDDY vs DCIT., CENTRAL CIRCLE - 1(3), HYDERABAD.

ITA 48/HYD/2025[2020-21]Status: Disposed3/7/2025AY 2020-21

SHRI VIJAY PAL RAO (Vice President), SHRI MANJUNATHA G (Accountant Member)

VENUGOPAL REDDY GELIVI,HYDERABAD vs ITO (INT TAXN)-1, HYDERABAD

ITA 393/HYD/2025[2015-16]Status: Disposed3/7/2025AY 2015-16

KONENI REDDEPPA NAIDU,CHITTOOR vs ITO., WARD -1, MADANAPALLE.

ITA 166/HYD/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed3/7/2025AY 2017-18

SHRI VIJAY PAL RAO (Vice President), SHRI MANJUNATHA G (Accountant Member)

SSNC FINTECH SERVICES INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs DCIT., CIRCLE 8(1), HYDERABAD

ITA 916/HYD/2024[AY 2020-21]Status: Disposed3/7/2025

THERMODYNE DYNAMICS PRIVATE LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs INCOME-TAX OFFICER, WARD -17(3), HYDERABAD

ITA 500/HYD/2024[2013-2014]Status: Disposed3/7/2025AY 2013-2014

us : “1. The impugned order of the learned Authorities below in so far as it is against the appellant is opposed to law, weight of evidence, natural justice, probabilities, facts and circumstances of the Appellant's case.

SRI VENAKTESWARA SWAMY DEVASTANAM,,JAMALAPURAM vs ITO., EXEMPTION WARD1- (3), HYDERABAD

ITA 1003/HYD/2024[2016-2017]Status: Disposed3/7/2025AY 2016-2017

Shri Vijay Pal Rao (Vice President), Shri Manjunatha, G. (Accountant Member)