Section 8D of the Income Tax Act

The decision most relied on for Section 8D is CIT v. Reliance Utilities & Power Ltd. (313 ITR 340), cited in 2,118 of the 401 judgments on BharatTax that turn on this section.

Leading authorities on Section 8D

CIT v. Reliance Utilities & Power Ltd.
313 ITR 340 · 2009 · High Court
2,118
citing judgments

Where an assessee claims that investments were made out of own funds, interest disallowance under Section 14A read with Rule 8D may not apply if the assessee demonstrates the availability of sufficient interest-free funds to cover such investments.

Maxopp Investment Ltd. v. CIT
402 ITR 640 · 2018 · Supreme Court
1,596
citing judgments

Disallowance under Section 14A is not automatic and requires the Assessing Officer to record satisfaction before applying Rule 8D. Only investments yielding exempt income are considered for disallowance, irrespective of their strategic nature.

Cheminvest Ltd. v. CIT
378 ITR 33 · 2015 · High Court
1,569
citing judgments

A disallowance under Section 14A of the Income-tax Act, 1961, for expenditure incurred in relation to exempt income cannot be made if the assessee has not earned any exempt income during the relevant previous year.

CIT v. HDFC Bank Ltd.
366 ITR 505 · 2014 · High Court
1,261
citing judgments

When an assessee possesses interest-free funds sufficient to cover investments yielding tax-free income, it is presumed that such investments were made from these interest-free funds, precluding disallowance of interest expenditure under Section 14A.

ACIT v. Vireet Investment Pvt. Ltd.
165 ITD 27 · 2017 · ITAT
882
citing judgments

No disallowance under section 14A can be made while computing book profits under section 115JB unless the expenditure is debited to the profit and loss account and satisfies clause (f) of Explanation 1 to section 115JB(2).

Joint Investments Pvt. Ltd. v. CIT
372 ITR 694 · 2015 · High Court
803
citing judgments

Disallowance under section 14A of the Income Tax Act cannot exceed the actual amount of exempt income earned by the assessee. This principle also applies when computing book profits under section 115JB.

ACIT v. Vireet Investment Pvt. Ltd.
82 Taxmann.com 415 · 2017 · High Court
789
citing judgments

Disallowance computed under Section 14A, read with Rule 8D, cannot be added to book profits under Section 115JB for Minimum Alternate Tax (MAT) purposes. Additionally, for Section 14A disallowance, only investments that yielded exempt income during the year are considered for calculating their average value.

Godrej & Boyce Manufacturing Company Ltd. v. DCIT
394 ITR 449 · 2017 · Supreme Court
683
citing judgments

Expenditure can only be disallowed under Section 14A if the income is exempt and not part of the total income. The Assessing Officer must first record dissatisfaction with the assessee's accounts or computation before proceeding to make a disallowance under Section 14A or applying Rule 8D.

Apollo Tyres Ltd. v. CIT
255 ITR 273 · 2002 · Supreme Court
657
citing judgments

For the purpose of computing book profits under Section 115J, arrears of depreciation, including those arising from assets working extra shifts, are a necessary charge on profits if debited to the profit and loss account and are allowable as such.

CIT v. Corrtech Energy (P.) Ltd.
223 Taxmann 130 · 2014 · High Court
579
citing judgments

Disallowance under Section 14A read with Rule 8D is not warranted if the assessee has not earned any exempt income in the relevant assessment year.

Judgments on Section 8D

M/S Bhagya Vinimoy Pvt. Ltd., Kolkata vs. ITO, Ward 5(3), Kolkata

ITA 1012/KOL/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata19 Sept 2018AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri J.Sudhakar Reddy & Shri S.S.Godaraassessment Year:2012-13 M/S Bhagya Vinimoy Pvt. Income Tax Officer, बनाम Ltd., 7A, 1St Floor, R.No. Ward-5(3), Chowringhee / 101, Bentinck Street, Old V/S. Square, Aayakar Bhawan, Wing, Kolkata-001 Kolkata-69 [Pan No.Aabcb 4476 H] .. अपीलाथ" /Appellant ""यथ" /Respondent Shri Sunil Surana, Fca अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/By Appellant Shri Robin Choudhury, Addl. Cit-Dr ""यथ" क" ओर से/By Respondent 21-08-2018 सुनवाई क" तार"ख/Date Of Hearing 19-09-2018 घोषणा क" तार"ख/Date Of Pronouncement आदेश /O R D E R Per S.S.Godara:- This Assessee’S Appeal For Assessment Year 1012-13 Arises Against The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)-23, Kolkata’S Order Dated 13.02.2017 Passed In Case No.101/Cit(A)-23/W-5(3)/16-17, Affirming Assessing Officer’S Action Adding Its Share Application / Premium Of ₹1,38,50,000/- To Be Unexplained Cash Credits & Disallowance U/S 14A R.W.S. 8D Disallowance Of ₹1,34,454/- In Assessment Order Dated 13.03.2015, Involving Proceedings U/S 143(3) Of The Income Tax Act, 1961; In Short ‘The Act’. Heard Both The Parties Strongly Reiterated Their Respective Stands Against & In Support Of The Impugned Additions. Case File Perused. 2. It Emerges At The Outset That The Cit(A)’S Order Passed Ex Parte Has Rejected Assessee’S Twin Substantive Grounds (Supra) Mainly For The Reason That It Had Failed To

Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 250(6)