Sfps Employees Gratuity Trust, Chennai vs. Asst Director of Income Tax, CPC, Bengaluru
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes
ITA 369/CHNY/2021[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai28 Jun 2022AY 2018-19
Bench: Shri Mahavir Singhand Shri G. Manjunathaआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.: 369/Chny/2021 िनधा"रण वष" /Assessment Year: 2018 - 19 Sfps Employees Gratuity Trust, The Acit, No.145, 1St Floor, V. Non-Corporate Ward-3(5), Santhome High Road, Chennai. Mylapore, Chennai – 600 004. Pan: Aatts 0132Q (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/Appellant By : Shri R. Sivaraman, Advocate ""यथ" क" ओर से/Respondent By : Shri P. Sajit Kumar, Jcit सुनवाई क" तार"ख/Date Of Hearing : 28.06.2022 घोषणा क" तार"ख/Date Of Pronouncement : 28.06.2022 आदेश /O R D E R Per Mahavir Singh: This Appeal By The Assessee Is Arising Out Of The Order Of Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi In Appeal No. Cit(A), Chennai-6/10341/2019-20, Order Dated 02.08.2021. The Return Of Income Was Processed By The Adit, Cpc, Bangalore For The Assessment Year 2018-19 U/S. 143(1) Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (Hereinafter The ‘Act’) Vide Order Dated 12.02.2020. I.T.A. No.369/Chny/2021 2 2. At The Outset, The Ld.Counsel For The Assessee Drew Our Attention To Ground No.5, Which Reads As Under:- 5. The Cit(A) Erred In Deleting The Appeal Assuming That The Issue Involved Was Deduction U/S.80P(2)(A) Though In The Appellants Case, The Issue Involved Was Exemption Of The Appellant’S Income U/S.10(25)(Iv).
For Appellant: Shri R. Sivaraman, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri P. Sajit Kumar, JCIT
Section 10(25)(iv)Section 143(1)Section 80P(2)(a)