Section 80IB(10) of the Income Tax Act

Income-tax Act, 2025: s.141

Section 80IB(10) falls under section 80IB of the Income-tax Act, 1961, which corresponds to section 141 (Deduction in respect of profits and gains from certain industrial undertakings) of the Income-tax Act, 2025.

Read section 141 of the 2025 Act

Correspondence checked against the ICAI tabular mapping of the two Acts and the BharatTax.co section commentary.

The decision most relied on for Section 80IB(10) is K.C. Builders & Anr. v. ACIT (265 ITR 562), cited in 241 of the 838 judgments on BharatTax that turn on this section.

Leading authorities on Section 80IB(10)

K.C. Builders & Anr. v. ACIT
265 ITR 562 · 2004 · Supreme Court
241
citing judgments

When the addition made in the assessment order, on the basis of which a penalty for concealment under section 271(1)(c) is levied, is subsequently deleted, the penalty has no basis and must be cancelled.

CIT v. Ansal Housing Finance & Leasing Co. Ltd.
354 ITR 180 · 2013 · High Court
208
citing judgments

Annual Letting Value (ALV) of unsold stock-in-trade flats/shops held by a real estate developer can be assessed under Section 22 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, as income from house property. This approach was followed by the Assessing Officer (AO) based on this decision.

CIT v. Brahma Associates
333 ITR 289 · 2011 · High Court
97
citing judgments

A developer is entitled to proportionate deduction under Section 80IB(10) for housing projects even if certain conditions, such as unit built-up area limits, are not fully met across all units. Additionally, the conditions introduced by Section 80IB(10)(d) apply prospectively to projects commenced and sanctioned before April 1, 2005.

CIT v. Vandana Properties
353 ITR 36 · 2013 · High Court
88
citing judgments

The Bombay High Court holds that for deduction under Section 80IB(10), the minimum plot area of one acre refers to the aggregate area of the land on which housing projects are developed, not necessarily to each individual project if multiple projects are undertaken on a larger single plot. This means the deduction is allowable even if a sub-block within the overall project is less than one acre, provided the total plot size meets the minimum.

CIT v. Sarkar Builders
375 ITR 392 · 2015 · Supreme Court
79
citing judgments

An assessee should not be prejudiced by differences in accounting treatment if accounting principles are duly followed and the issue is revenue neutral, as hypothetical income cannot be subjected to tax.

Viswas Promoters Pvt. Ltd. v. ACIT
255 CTR 149 · 2013 · High Court
36
citing judgments

The mere fact that one block in a housing project has units exceeding the built-up area limit does not disqualify the entire project from claiming deduction under section 80IB(10). Assessees are entitled to proportionate deduction for eligible blocks or units.

(i) Viswas Promoters Pvt. Ltd. v. Assistant CIT, Circle I, Madras
29 Taxmann.com 19 · 2013 · High Court
28
citing judgments

Deduction under section 80-IB(10) is available on a proportionate basis for eligible units, even if some units in a project exceed the prescribed area limits. The entire claim should not be rejected due to partial non-compliance.

Ramco Cements Ltd. v. DCIT
373 ITR 146 · 2015 · High Court
28
citing judgments

An assessee can make a claim of deduction for the first time before the appellate authorities.

PCIT, Panaji v. Goa Tourism Development Ltd.
102 Taxmann.com 437 · 2019 · High Court
26
citing judgments

Expenditure incurred for repairs and renovation of hotel premises, which improves existing business without creating a new asset or advantage of an enduring nature, is treated as revenue expenditure.

Siddhivinayak Kohinoor Venture v. ACIT
159 TTJ 390 · 2014 · ITAT
17
citing judgments

An undertaking developing and building housing projects is eligible for deduction under section 80IB(10) if the housing project receives approval, and a separate approval for each distinct housing project within a larger development is not necessarily required.

Judgments on Section 80IB(10)

Mukon Constructions P.Ltd, Mumbai vs. Asst CIT 6(30, Mumbai

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 5538/MUM/2011[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai14 Mar 2017AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh, Jm & Shri Rajesh Kumar, Am श्री महाविर स िंग, न्याययक दस्य एििं श्री राजेश कुमार, ऱेखा दस्य के मक्ष M/S Mukon Constructions Pvt Ltd. Asstt. Commissioner Of Income 261, Sant Tukaram Marg, Tax-Range-6(3), फनधभ/ Carnac Bunder, Ayakar Bhavan, Vs. Masjit, Mumbai-400020 Mumbai-400009 (अऩीरधथी /Appellant) (प्रत्मथी / Respondent) स्थधमी रेखध सं./ Pan : Aadcm1616L (अऩीरधथी /Appellant) (प्रत्मथी / Respondent) : अऩीरधथी की ओय से /Assessee By : Shri Prakash Jyotwani प्रत्मथी की ओय से/Revenue By : Dr.Suman Ratnam सुनवधई की तधयीख /Date Of Hearing : 6.2.2017 घोषणध की तधयीख /Date Of : 15. 3.2017 Pronouncement आदेश / O R D E R Per Rajesh Kumar, A. M: Appeal Filed By The Assessee Pertains To The Assessment Year 2007-08 & Is Directed Against The Order Dated 4.1.2011 Passed By The Ld.Cit(A)-12, Mumbai In Which The Assessee Has Raised The Issue Of Confirmation Of Disallowance By Ld.Cit(A) U/S 80Ib(10) Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 To The Tune Of Rs.4,71,15,704/- As Held By The Ao On The Ground That The Development Rights (Tdr) From The Slump Rehabilitation Authority (Hereafter

For Appellant: Shri Prakash JyotwaniFor Respondent: Dr.Suman Ratnam
Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 80I

ACIT 17(2), Mumbai vs. Mudit Madanlal Gupte, Mumbai

In the result, the appeal of the revenue stands dismissed

ITA 5121/MUM/2014[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai24 Jan 2017AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh, Jm & Shri Rajesh Kumar, Am आयकर अपीऱ सं./I.T.A. No.5121/Mum/2014 (ननधधारण वषा / Assessment Year : 2010-11) बनधम/ Dy.Commissioner Of Income Tax- Shri Mudhit Madanlal Gupta, 1St Floor, Bahubali Building, 17(2), Vs. Room No.217, 2Nd Floor, Cawasji Patel, Piramal Chambers, Fort, Mumbai-400012 Mumbai-400019 स्थधयी ऱेखध सं./ Pan :Aacpg3554F अपीऱार्थी ओर से / Appellant By Shri A K Dhondial प्रत्यर्थी की ओर से/Respondent By Shri Neeraj Agarwal सुनवाई की तारीख / Date Of Hearing : 18.1.2017 घोषणा की तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement :24.1.2017 आदेश / O R D E R Per Rajesh Kumar, Am The Appeal Filed By The Revenue Is Directed Against The Order Dated 30.5.2014, Passed By The Commissioner Of Income Tax(A), Mumbai U/S 143(3) Of The Income Tax Act For The Assessment Year 2009-10. 2. The Only Effective Ground Raised By The Revenue Is Against The Deletion Of Disallowance Under Section 80Ib(10) Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 Amounting To Rs.46,12,951/- By The Ld.Cit(A) As Made By The Ao Without Appreciating That The Necessary Condition Precedent For Allowing

Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 260Section 801B(10)Section 80I